Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension Adoption - 9/10 to 9/24 - Adoption process extended (11/24 to 12/8)

<stephane.litkowski@orange.com> Tue, 24 November 2015 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D32D1A8839; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:07:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iPBYKKd2gNzF; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:07:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-nor34.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFFAB1A8AD7; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:07:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr01.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.65]) by opfednr21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id E846AC0232; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:07:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.57]) by opfednr01.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AFD041A0066; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:07:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::787e:db0c:23c4:71b3%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:07:14 +0100
From: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension Adoption - 9/10 to 9/24 - Adoption process extended (11/24 to 12/8)
Thread-Index: AdEmp77IxuKghE5kRa2lcwZ7iCLuqwAKl61w
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:07:13 +0000
Message-ID: <1977_1448381234_56548B32_1977_847_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF9216789B52@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <054501d126a8$63153330$293f9990$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <054501d126a8$63153330$293f9990$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF9216789B52OPEXCLILMA4corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/DXSujUAA4Qb87enZJUUZvaRvXeo>
Cc: "draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension@ietf.org" <draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension Adoption - 9/10 to 9/24 - Adoption process extended (11/24 to 12/8)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:07:26 -0000

Hi Susan,

I'm not aware of any other IPR.

Best Regards,

Stephane


From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:08
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension@ietf.org; 'Pushpasis Sarkar'
Subject: draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension Adoption - 9/10 to 9/24 - Adoption process extended (11/24 to 12/8)

Pushpasis and WG:

Thank you for your question regarding draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension-03.txt.   The WG adoption call (9/10 to 9/214) has indicated interest in this document.

However, during the adoption process I failed to raise the IPR issues, and this draft has the following IPR disclosure: http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2558/.  Therefore, we will need to extend the WG call to ask the all co-authors to respond to this message if they know of any additional IPR.  After the authors respond, we will do a 1 week WG conformation call that the WG still wants to adopt the work given the IPR.

If you could get your co-authors to quickly indicate their IPR status, it would be helpful.

If you have implemented these TLVs and SUB-TLVs, it would be good to update the list on the implementation status.

Sue Hares
PS - I apologize for missing the IPR during the first WG adoption call period.




_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorization.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange shall not be liable if this message was modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.