Re: [Idr] Second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024)

Hi Sue,

> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-ct-06 is an experimental draft.

Sorry to ask but what is draft-ietf-idr-bgp-*car-ct*-06 ???
                                                                  ^^^^^^
- - -

Dear WG,

Assuming that the above draft is just the dream of the future and that we
are last calling CAR draft here, namely draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 I do
support WG LC on it.

Nice and clean solution for those interested in color aware routing.

Moreover, it is very extendable towards future needs in this space.

And what may be quite important to note here - does not require any updates
to RFC4456 - instead proposed to leverage RFC7311 when preferred path
selection is needed.

Kind regards,
Robert

On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 3:56 AM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> This begins a 2-week second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car/
>
>
>
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-ct-06 is an experimental draft.
>
>
>
> The implementation report is at:
>
> https://wiki.ietf.org/group/idr/implementations/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car
>
>
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 should reply to this message with
> an email
>
> If they know of any IPR related to this draft beyond the 4 IPR disclosures
>
> (ID 6098, ID 5563, ID 5562, and ID 4844).
>
>
>
> Since this is the second WG LC, please comment on any
>
> technical issues or editorial issues relating to the draft.
>
>
>
> We will close this second WG LC promptly on 3/1/2024 so the editors
>
> can provide a final draft prior to the IETF Draft deadline on March 4,
> 2024.
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Susan Hares
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>