Re: [Idr] Second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024)

Nat Kao <pyxislx@gmail.com> Tue, 27 February 2024 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <pyxislx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51D0C14CE24 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rn-SfgOLfwrE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3BEEC14F6BB for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a3ed9cae56fso612519466b.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709000417; x=1709605217; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=72/a0gLFZL3bko7mrlx8dgPIfc5fKk7ZnT8TvVr61v4=; b=Jv1hKSECn6C7i5w6rAYHqa6KkexmpyF7bWNdfhUzo+OhlF8N1OD9zESLrO2T0l8dnK 5e3yxTACfRSPN9y00fVpAMNdGGjrgQZuzuhvwR+eXht/UdVEm2cPcgdYc1B6PePHkb7N b6J/JgD1mEpZRVY9G3D74yf0HTj9QKt5ArUY2hB2DVApWfJelHYt9EnIQj0fveTnE71q SyiOL23QYLIiYNisKUi/CGZGFdsRTgyiT+23hvaLYKve3LKaE6oeTcHdCTrGraw7hF1O R1igxseWjiHxK9DmsNclYJJcZX7zsBJesNiuXWRf65v/Ti1YPch0B1fiFN4q5ITFs5uV imEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709000417; x=1709605217; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=72/a0gLFZL3bko7mrlx8dgPIfc5fKk7ZnT8TvVr61v4=; b=nQM+wZIR5Lj+bRhJckwF2XHkZIGPhREXU9Y0E+pd3rg6FzG85nnU+EEItSy4m3E46V tP/QulUAL++SApBp8IMUsWqXCGQDVSPRfPpMW9qn5KdP9+ukxxlbVu4FvLgDlKSnCHwi h5xBkgaszbmfsedAbA+Zon3stflpdnMW8L5KBvZJvoq24JK/I3RrgIYOM8lNVNQywgU5 jJYbz5J1GZSg9mOCJm+8C0gM1urB1R5Z1+mJEMb4IvlfFpAaHV/Md9ZbLyMMDVqEybqR 4zvLcxJc0MpoB8qGDKZiFEbSj4bwYCVz0IodDcsQ0l6tlBn01J/ne7s/xqPQGbZj127T 2piQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxIDgJ3F920dzcYO3IRFoeY/LYPIW3tXx5z9QgEveVaYWMM1gg5 7qYkz7vJzTM7XnIK4hR4iGMNqrc8r7ZyGICDTW9zzyS+KBA7xEHJHNyxLDyBD011bgh30tjK91S XOyfwcbKWJ1U7Uqgup6QxHBpVPylqMA9kvvY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH26BsnKvK2O7qJEDwsZIDf+Q0Psw65xbEUHIFE6mCXc6f4owEUZ91FtMZbbZl2sMRyyURsCvpXiv9bH9m86yU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5044:b0:a43:5c1c:70f4 with SMTP id e4-20020a170906504400b00a435c1c70f4mr2902323ejk.38.1709000417225; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR08MB485786422DB915FFD4BE896BB3532@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMFmHrmug7itq8=u6r58rBoNjVikBZPEBKvcR9NkGZnz6Q@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR08MB4857FEE00378D40C35CDCAADB3542@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR08MB4857FEE00378D40C35CDCAADB3542@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Nat Kao <pyxislx@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:19:41 +0800
Message-ID: <CAKEJeo6s1UTUgQU4x-NsWMoehZ32eY-n+MuUwZR7K79-8B6_3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ca2d05061253aa66"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/NOsduQSUlf3qG1_zN20S6O9SNDY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:20:23 -0000

Hi, Susan.
I support this document moving forward.
Thanks,
Nat

On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 4:10 AM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> Robert:
>
>
>
> Just in case it was unclear from the title, the draft under consideration
> is
>
>
>
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06.txt.
>
>
>
> My apologies to the IDR WG for the late-night error.
>
>
>
> I’m glad your are checking what you are reading.
>
>
>
> Sue Hares
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 17, 2024 10:46 AM
> *To:* Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
> *Cc:* idr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Idr] Second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06
> (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024)
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Sue,
>
>
>
> > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-ct-06 is an experimental draft.
>
>
>
> Sorry to ask but what is draft-ietf-idr-bgp-*car-ct*-06 ???
>
>                                                                   ^^^^^^
>
> - - -
>
>
>
> Dear WG,
>
>
>
> Assuming that the above draft is just the dream of the future and that we
> are last calling CAR draft here, namely draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 I do
> support WG LC on it.
>
>
>
> Nice and clean solution for those interested in color aware routing.
>
>
>
> Moreover, it is very extendable towards future needs in this space.
>
>
>
> And what may be quite important to note here - does not require any
> updates to RFC4456 - instead proposed to leverage RFC7311 when preferred
> path selection is needed.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 3:56 AM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>
> This begins a 2-week second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car/
>
>
>
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-ct-06 is an experimental draft.
>
>
>
> The implementation report is at:
>
> https://wiki.ietf.org/group/idr/implementations/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car
>
>
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 should reply to this message with
> an email
>
> If they know of any IPR related to this draft beyond the 4 IPR disclosures
>
> (ID 6098, ID 5563, ID 5562, and ID 4844).
>
>
>
> Since this is the second WG LC, please comment on any
>
> technical issues or editorial issues relating to the draft.
>
>
>
> We will close this second WG LC promptly on 3/1/2024 so the editors
>
> can provide a final draft prior to the IETF Draft deadline on March 4,
> 2024.
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Susan Hares
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>