IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-00.txt

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Tue, 27 September 2016 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9D612B2A0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.114
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.114 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMXpaJG707iC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C41712B202 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l132so197329949wmf.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=u50uIk3pl33k878cg+fsqQLohl4lj9T6C36IrZpcvP4=; b=r6GD0yuQ/qON+D7sjIctfBkEPW2tCVK4+qZJLq4VMpWsVb3HCkguS9I6CmUZ4yeouI 62EkXhCr7WSRYEShjhBuUbCLwcEopcqZoL2l7iP+P6X8rCfw3WUFFnXk5KyWI74z20JQ W3wFc0452mQz+sILiwBKqhgQygE2D2dwPt0DO4q4Kh8QOHP5/5brF06Xd76sq/DuuRnx FSmNLEmKQ+SmjRNpAIlH4+oIIgjZl0qK4FgKtZYDhNPxjRdDLHMlUN/4R2dfIYI/g6S2 8MLEogbzOHg7tRhbtRQ0RwIwre3Uwzc2traDmUTuMPI5e0hWGnO1IN74OogOYl83JKTt 2OgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=u50uIk3pl33k878cg+fsqQLohl4lj9T6C36IrZpcvP4=; b=USJrpstZZm80L2b3DTop6f4PCuDnevoQVPFAPlCRH9D1ccm4Tqgk5hwGRLZZ+Ua4Kp yniYw0AY1cJLsJEcF1PRMsQ7dtBDwamt0S3ndAEdqr7tMSe/N2bETwIEHXA3pN2Z4Fyj kID9tNam2euwV6WnZVvj93GstBVpRPthqIHuzn8ga4WiEd6XzsM/PrRnRNY6STsjqHMK KKr81k3BmVjH7ykjbS4LJ8vj3bpvCtzAqLoaRoUiU789uwDmGGf6Oy4oTjccqSnhzYgX HUDyv1LNN20T25CGXkSqgB2wUfyr+2nxDUxBns8nAWAlzf6JaUQ7/JiauyqQmgCTIuNb vwSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPXpYWs6c6RXfV0sMJtlikwX2c6hL590SuvnsMKNj9T4nKgXedx4/hhE89/OvRtiA==
X-Received: by 10.194.42.133 with SMTP id o5mr28509621wjl.200.1475007498476; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:894b:94a1:8bef:6b50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d64sm20066313wmh.0.2016.09.27.13.18.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:18:16 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20160927201816.GN1543@Vurt.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <E06E8C1D-F962-4980-BC48-9908C189F8ED@juniper.net> <D41049FD.80D0D%acee@cisco.com> <028f01d218a3$9dea9ca0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/GZjPJK9Zqm3g-QBltCn8JPaTOdI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-00.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:18:23 -0000

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:43:24AM +0100, t.petch wrote:
> And the Abstract should not contain citations.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:10:18PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> On 9/27/16, 3:52 PM, "Idr on behalf of heasley" <idr-bounces@ietf.org on
> behalf of heas@shrubbery.net> wrote:
> 
> > Why?  The citation defines the term, so it seems perfectly reasonable
> > to do so.
> 
> This is an IETF RFC convention. The abstract may be extracted and
> should be autonomous. Refer to section 4.3:
> 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7322.txt

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:08:42PM -0400, John G. Scudder wrote:
> The simplest answer to "why" is that it's standard IETF style – idnits
> complains if you have citations in your abstract, like so:
> 
>   ** The abstract seems to contain references ([RFC4271], [RFC6793],
>      [RFC1997]), which it shouldn't.  Please replace those with straight
>      textual mentions of the documents in question.

Thanks Tom, Acee, John Scudder, we'll improve the abstract.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email