IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt

Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com> Fri, 06 November 1998 14:42 UTC

Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [198.108.1.42]) by nic.merit.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA14312 for <idr-archive@nic.merit.edu>; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 09:42:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by merit.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id JAA07383 for idr-outgoing; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 09:35:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dale.cisco.com (dale.cisco.com [171.69.63.38]) by merit.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA07379 for <idr@merit.edu>; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 09:35:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (yakov@localhost) by dale.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA21725; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 06:33:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199811061433.GAA21725@dale.cisco.com>
To: Tony Li <tli@juniper.net>
cc: jgs@ieng.com, rohitd@dnrc.bell-labs.com, idr@merit.edu
Subject: Re: draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Nov 1998 13:03:42 PST." <199811052103.NAA14579@chimp.juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 06:33:47 -0800
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

Tony,

> |  >I believe that an appropriate way of addressing this comment would be a
> |  >update of RFC 1966.
> |  
> |  What's the next step for doing that?
> 
> 
> I believe that the authors should be given first shot at doing this update,
> perhaps with a gentle nudge from the WG co-chairs.

I think this is an excellent idea. Your point about "a gentle nudge"
is well taken.

Yakov.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email