Re: draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt

Rohit Dube <rohitd@dnrc.bell-labs.com> Fri, 06 November 1998 14:47 UTC

Message-Id: <199811061443.JAA27124@zubin.dnrc.bell-labs.com>
To: Tony Li <tli@juniper.net>
cc: jgs@ieng.com, rohitd@dnrc.bell-labs.com, idr@merit.edu
Subject: Re: draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Nov 1998 13:03:42 PST." <199811052103.NAA14579@chimp.juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 09:43:29 -0500
From: Rohit Dube <rohitd@dnrc.bell-labs.com>
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:03:42 -0800 (PST) tli@juniper.net writes:
=>|  >This should certainly be fully documented, if only for truth in
=>|  >advertising.
=>|  
=>|  You mean, emphasized in RFC 1966?  Yup.
=>
=>
=>Yes, exactly.
=>
=>
=>|  >I believe that an appropriate way of addressing this comment would be a
=>|  >update of RFC 1966.
=>|  
=>|  What's the next step for doing that?
=>
=>
=>I believe that the authors should be given first shot at doing this update,
=>perhaps with a gentle nudge from the WG co-chairs.

Tony,

First, thanks for your comments. I'll go over them in detail.

About the next step - this is something I had discussed with the Co-author
(John) before we submitted the draft and we had hoped to take the draft 
(after appropriate discussion and ammendments) to an Informational RFC. 
Ofcourse, the actual decision is really up to the WG chairs.

--rohit.

Re: draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt Rohit Dube
Re: draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt Yakov Rekhter
Re: draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt Tony Li
Re: draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt John G. Scudder
draft-dube-route-reflection-harmful-00.txt Tony Li