IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] RS BFD draft

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 31 March 2017 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D389212422F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oo0vnDF_EU5W for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2308612995D for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id l7so40668876ioe.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=RZ42fEDM0/7cRnRryPg+m5uXfbXuS1zT76ULPWfZXW0=; b=Q54K0BiMCIZ11w8deC0BF6DMRcBwc3FX7qqaLy7R/PGZatmA+jE6dDagXs4lKiiRmE SI/UiNO68YmRkjpoIJj2r6DHcg+uQB1isGhQHfquSmgTrZEV+2JixpA1Tr15rXgNt2Rm WonPzRYnjuuX4HMDGybLK3b0f27rZ1xc4UDq8EztKTE7cdo2rNcGhO2UeisFXrPUkfDc WBzHUvd9tjfaX2LMA/d7WmF1H7+SeWVjx4TbkaqjT2p3Stq9isFmz16snKMjF/P0l+3l lE04ll09IRqarCyg1T5+y6EbtbtzpQXfwlOa/ucPi39Kke5XBj6rvW5VT8XMnpVvt+M/ QbuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RZ42fEDM0/7cRnRryPg+m5uXfbXuS1zT76ULPWfZXW0=; b=Bh6+V+p1dJkRL7CgWQbkKcatku2Rwb9nRsTrvGT6X13pV30/VDMn1KtQ9vN5ZHwWVv 2VfgLDHjwJIUsWPMPze68LZM5sznuIFoNzUdh7tYisy4UErG52CdZ5CFyfQzHGM2UzHY Ciql4QzjRBf4c9YtxmhGrrAY5ufYMAQE2DryXTKYcAdTG5SyI3kcHDWsGp0dipzqUU+f 2BKWE+f+bx/P8jKcpkPoXqlQHoV5XokMuK+nQ9i8Gyp4ZzTRvaLmuyRnUQw/+ma2qR7d G73mO3Hi/zkhirN6BuRF5a8T59AFtqdvgxNBryoMrC9KaQ+CiAh1kqyVexMCHwaXxBBs swfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0RA5hjaWEo4xftBmPRA/P9GMNrRkbWNHHZhrbSTcvEnOieXMJ8NnGT/n2UacRhUrsE9U8qLHLaHoHqhg==
X-Received: by 10.107.10.21 with SMTP id u21mr3705260ioi.139.1490970849427; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.90.71 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.90.71 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=3qy_096Q61FBQgkRSt8j0P1NTQ+EFVit0XEnWvLp6mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+b+ER=z+=EYP=2VeHAVyhOtvS+FWQ_0EKnp+WpfcHtamPQT8A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk2ijzaX1eNeeEEbJ9pJWby+4TftouCtVEh=nyxzYOSPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnHAdrQa1f-b7st3QBjzbFS1zvktkGCAppRuqGkf8Vnhg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=E1FV4=-W9jcHG4ih0GeE2O1jDXKNAZhEe+nENEHAiYg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkfV4C++arFCBXnyjgkA-FtcqMmd8_9UcbKLWxR32h1EQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkvu296sqD_bi41++RqHiV-f+4cUpb1BPrhE6HsxeueqA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk+XP5DvuZStYW=e1uGRWDWE-PiPdwhtkHiVK7hFui7_g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmapG68ysZ4=6uDAH=Z+fRaprzgsyQASP4aYD=OTea_Qg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkZ-WY5FWiDu_k=1+7tUHEApYj+mMLqZiFzTWGuvHLjGA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=MBiFno8CDv9JgpFFmJz4cuDe_tQhm+AHx5njxJy6p6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=3qy_096Q61FBQgkRSt8j0P1NTQ+EFVit0XEnWvLp6mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:34:08 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1UkltXUluk5wsZH8-G80DGpz3Tw
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmuGSZBcboZDsRo1NDb3dsRozmcEW77KWLyzyjxK8ezww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ed766da7e15054c07b39c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Lfu77zCDvazc9SGX_6BAhXCaXw0>
Subject: [Idr] RS BFD draft
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:34:15 -0000

Hi Jeff,

To your point of assymetry ...

If the assymetry happens between clients placed in different rib groups of
the given RS to corellate it is really ugly and breaks all today's code
running as BGP route servers in the field.

Besides for say UDP streaming unidirectional connectivity is not that bad
to withdraw reachability just because symmetry is not there.

Last most IX clients may have other connectivty outside of IX fabric in one
or both directions so even TCP would work.

Bottom line I agree on the need to document as BCP NH tracking part of the
draft between IX clients, but new SAFI seems to me not to be a best idea.

Best,
R.

PS. If client does not support add-path it can use different sessions as
described by RFC6774.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email