[Idr] Topic: Global ID for MT-ID values - VTN-ID
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 21 December 2021 16:33 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A1F3A0D10 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:33:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZfsIaEANuP3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802213A0EC7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:33:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.111.9;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:33:11 -0500
Message-ID: <00b201d7f688$7284f420$578edc60$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B3_01D7F65E.89B072C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: Adf2hVdju+agZlKVQW2kTRMGP7JBsQ==
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Ns03MiErq_l179f2NNixGmDBYXw>
Subject: [Idr] Topic: Global ID for MT-ID values - VTN-ID
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:33:19 -0000
During the adoption of draft-xie-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-03.txt, the IDR chairs asked the following question: 2) Should IDR recommend the global ID that for MT-ID? As part of the discussion, the discussion indicated that the following two drafts have a solution for this work in BGP-LS: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-transport-slice-03.txt draft-dong-idr-bgpls-sr-enhanced-vpn-03.txt the following text is taken from these two drafts: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-transport-slide-03.txt defines an NRPID. NRPID: Network Resource Partition identifier. [I-D.bestbar-spring-scalable-ns] describes an approach to extend SR to advertiser new SID types called Network Resource Partition identifier(NRPID) SIDs. draft-dong-idr-bgpls-sr-enhanced-vpn-03.txt defines an VTN-ID. [I-D.ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments] introduces resource- awareness to Segment Routing (SR) [RFC8402 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8402> ] by associating existing type of SIDs with network resource attributes (e.g. bandwidth, processing or storage resources). VTN ID: A global significant 32-bit identifier which is used to identify a virtual transport network. This mail thread is to discuss the requirement for global-IDs, and a comparison/contrast of these two solutions. Cheers, Sue
- [Idr] Topic: Global ID for MT-ID values - VTN-ID Susan Hares