Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-12 (draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps)

"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CBE3A0BD9; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=gjxMASng; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=S5jt5onc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IQArT9PFNHEq; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3998E3A0BD7; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17715; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1596551163; x=1597760763; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=EuZxXXSxhOuKS++SFZM1asV4HqUrVtdi+YKFTnsr63c=; b=gjxMASng1fLIcMsdsVI3PPELYYOmJpUEu7xb+eibpTe8Mzv8TeGBirWr 9L+uoihZdOoKKIypstPGAcE35SSf42J3jZLW9yjlE4A9gNYAmrEA594Cw VZJlfAW5aBuusNCc6jc5yZ3Ii3jmXUoNlD2Oic3Qu9llPH2z7uXnaGJv+ 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AgNmQfRwGQSs5i77XCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9p?= =?us-ascii?q?sgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWDt/pohV7NG47c7qEMh+nXtvXmXmoNqdaEvWsZeZNBHx?= =?us-ascii?q?kClY0NngMmDcLEbC+zLPPjYyEgWsgXUlhj8iK0NEFUHID1YFiB6nG35CQZTx?= =?us-ascii?q?P4Mwc9L+/pG4nU2sKw0e36+5DabwhSwjSnZrYnJxStpgKXvc4T0oY=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DGCgCMbylf/4UNJK1gHAEBAQEBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?BARIBAQQEAQGCCoEjL1EHb1gvLAqEK4NGA40rJYoEiXOEbIJTA1ULAQEBDAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BIwoCBAEBhEwCF4INAiQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FXAyFcQEBAQMBEhE?= =?us-ascii?q?dAQE3AQQHBAIBCA4DAwECKAMCAgIfERQJCAIEAQ0FFA6DBAGBfk0DDiABDqd?= =?us-ascii?q?WAoE5iGF2gTKDAQEBBYEzAYN1DQuCDgMGgTiCcINfgQGFPhqBQT+BOAwQghg?= =?us-ascii?q?1PoIaQgKBfw0JgmAzgi2SeIZei1qQGU4KgmKIYYwxhHkDHoJ8iU6TMY1hhEW?= =?us-ascii?q?KM4Jjkg8CBAIEBQIOAQEFgWojgVdwFWUBggoBATJQFwINjh8MFxSDOoUUhUJ?= =?us-ascii?q?0NwIGAQcBAQMJfI1mAYEQAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,434,1589241600"; d="scan'208,217";a="540035780"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Aug 2020 14:26:02 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 074EQ2GI018540 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:26:02 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:26:01 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:26:01 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:26:01 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HjkGdWNkYALkxzpfxHguUVE5I1aDxu3G7gm1cgufq006f3IjoQd6bSfAlLz4tczIuiWzFbgw4/ZpFlQI6xx61KBLgvM4G770KmszuQW3McGxUV4X3RxPxIlC/EQpG2MIpf1rjXvjPbbxmoBaNL2mlFU5+KnHQyFa0aPjUCV0PX1ZFHEA+0byhLv1yx0OqshvFy0kHsdZ2r1rv4UcyxI1vfzpnvfTqNrIA9TTyoY/ZLJ+KPdh2jZG51T1GbrlNvY+dxxtfgi3VoiVJomcVv5aYD99otrWNtHapKrXwE9g04iYCNrQFwsK5Ty734l7xCw/QeEjHI6tqNvw4K5ffOTyuA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EuZxXXSxhOuKS++SFZM1asV4HqUrVtdi+YKFTnsr63c=; b=Jvgci6BpDB1OCPqM3oyBlR8r6GRzYcbv9Hs03HuaKMfN3PhihYvxV85eKKhrMbm9VpP5nYFnIW6zWnb/bipOewD2F9uBocCA8OlNwE7h2L+SIs/EIgd44iSExnBoepRv8VLqbn/FXEBKpuORx0tGJSsaQxFxbXZCA01h+mWUr0atwvJ5XqPrJg1LS/wC+IgmoT0hYVPvBKj9FnWPmileRPDhYv4di+u4cbRJy13x4FVshVvqFeX/lf3UmvgGsAD9ObsxRoRJhsDm7kpT4ypkmmgoKocHC60PiNHHb9dxLNlqOgpH/LxdcQzH3h2oYGdMx2Z3RK+pwkv6/d6CCUpd/Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EuZxXXSxhOuKS++SFZM1asV4HqUrVtdi+YKFTnsr63c=; b=S5jt5oncmsnzqYpbdm/1eDEmX0UJOrMEHI8aV8R0j+/Tzsnk4LusfiuzPpSGw3NYVb07ET/JRW7YEEKCnbjnw3D5f4SiawGhp0S20s+O/1+nSdo6/RobaUdCRI+vxH1YSriZfYqfmSW6lX42jqxY+uBHB9P90iNEDIwIzq7fuWA=
Received: from BN6PR1101MB2337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:92::23) by BN6PR11MB4098.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:7f::36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3239.17; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:26:00 +0000
Received: from BN6PR1101MB2337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::38b6:487b:687c:aaa7]) by BN6PR1101MB2337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::38b6:487b:687c:aaa7%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3239.021; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:26:00 +0000
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org>
CC: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-12 (draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps)
Thread-Index: AQHWamaYdI9NJQh2ZEykMbEj5ReRg6knvn2A
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:26:00 +0000
Message-ID: <F1B57466-71CD-43B8-9648-70249EB3E9B3@cisco.com>
References: <CAMMESsz1R9u4fJUkFr0wxd8OF3u==PvPkr+6t7sXHNGaPR2-tQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsxbetZAWvSSaYU3DS0W_CASzP7YeCnEpFyoURfd1uZRgg@mail.gmail.com> <49B487FD-EF5A-42AA-9A50-2D03BBCA0796@cisco.com> <CAMMESswFBmEJe5_Fj=n_n9G5xKzJwwxWU4552TQXxTw9SVfwpA@mail.gmail.com> <77889DBF-DBE9-400A-ACE9-E0E397EB9166@cisco.com> <CAMMESsy7ArJ+S6bSfwsc0URzk5k6WRkf1N3mrdw4JnvAaHYKuw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsy7ArJ+S6bSfwsc0URzk5k6WRkf1N3mrdw4JnvAaHYKuw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.39.20071300
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.51.227]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bfa4f39f-3911-43d0-ca9d-08d838824f8d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB4098:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB4098278FD3211F7B3D3C7878C74A0@BN6PR11MB4098.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: BVftdBf5i3HZU/Sq6FjhSDdtsmiZ2uoFw1EuWKSCMB+fVWJLOM3zA3V1TpajWBP5RB0m0fXqkr8Lnq1UhZkZXv0rwVRu8IQ8vjvLs2FAdhzoJLkEP88E1SkZpi3cZi5GbRS/g7l4URVABbzls8eMwyTCisvmKB29rp38voaLqwAn9mAVR9gixAYZ2FGh9D2kxO1VFGtXEnnC1tyoot3cqd4h6VJERY8YjtqrjusGhWWferfbs8nYacq8GXNdMKWgcDiNi//duxCJPPEM+57W+75PJcxI0te21ZvAWGvzUGmfp/NDC36kEtReSfNtf1ighmgBXVyFckLz65GgglpaAPuZVkznsfyzBVYjyM7kRv0gp4UydAaqg67Ezt4MFAaL5kP5dVXUdhQumWNINUREIA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR1101MB2337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(316002)(6512007)(54906003)(6486002)(33656002)(110136005)(26005)(186003)(6506007)(53546011)(8936002)(2906002)(9326002)(8676002)(76116006)(66446008)(5660300002)(66476007)(91956017)(66946007)(966005)(478600001)(86362001)(71200400001)(2616005)(4326008)(166002)(83380400001)(36756003)(66556008)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F1B5746671CD43B8964870249EB3E9B3ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR1101MB2337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bfa4f39f-3911-43d0-ca9d-08d838824f8d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Aug 2020 14:26:00.2892 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: uMcZRUU8muH1fL/etINLiv+xsi81XV5cE347EoId/iAK+LQcNLZHzGYJ52FsUXs47HMBez6Ezxf8vdFDxYtL7Q==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB4098
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/QB3Cg9FszgSzHwxIwcy2A7bUzT4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-12 (draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:26:07 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

I don’t think so. Still waiting to hear back from the authors of tunnel-encaps draft.

--
Cheers,
Rajiv

From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 9:53 AM
To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com>om>, "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>om>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>rg>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria@ietf.org>rg>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-12 (draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps)

Hi!

Did this conversation go anywhere?  Just curious.

Alvaro.


On May 4, 2020 at 5:46:58 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (rajiva@cisco.com<mailto:rajiva@cisco.com>) wrote:
Alvaro,

Well pointed. Back in Feb, when I went through the encap draft (recalling the machinery like in the below excerpt) and discussed with Acee, I also realized these two drafts being complementary in that NH verification regard.

/
If the Tunnel Endpoint sub-TLV contains an IPv4 or IPv6 address that
is valid but not reachable,
/

The question (of yours) we need to answer is what's in scope and what's not. For ex, what OAM protocol is used for reachability determination should be out of scope, but where this check is executed should be. Hoping that we have some active discussion on that.

Keyur, Srihari, Gunter, thoughts?

--
Cheers,
Rajiv

-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, May 4, 2020 at 2:44 PM
To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com<mailto:rajiva@cisco.com>>, "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org>>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:idr-chairs@ietf.org>" <idr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:idr-chairs@ietf.org>>, "idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-12
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com<mailto:rajiva@cisco.com>>
Resent-Date: Monday, May 4, 2020 at 2:44 PM

On May 4, 2020 at 2:10:14 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:

[Explicitly adding draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps to the distribution.]


Rajiv:

Hi!


> Thanks, Alvaro. While it would have been preferred to keep the (NH selection
> / verification) logic independent, it seems that there may perhaps be the
> following 2 means to solidify the logic -
>
> a- Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute (updating rfc5512)
> b- Cost Community
>
> It seems that (a) is somewhat more progressive than (b), and clearly conveys
> the encap preference that can be leveraged. Thoughts?
>
> If agreed, then section 3 could be updated to reflect something akin to the
> following -
...


As a matter of fact, §5 of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps lists

* The tunnel is specified in a TLV whose Tunnel Endpoint sub-TLV
identifies an IP address that is reachable.

...as a condition for the tunnel to be considered feasible. In my
review of that document [1] I wrote this:

[major] How is reachability determined? Where (which table) should
the address be looked up in? In the sequence above, the destination
address of P and the address of the endpoint may be resolvable in
different tables...

[BTW, please also take a look at
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria, which I think tries to
define a related, if not the same, concept.]


I think this is a good time for you and the authors of
draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps to talk.


Thanks!

Alvaro.


[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/S1nyz1sewA_Xqf63W_vz8c4L8Z0/