Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 22 February 2013 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4506821F8F45 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:00:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qt82LeyBavcn for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD25E21F8F44 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k13so350997iea.35 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:00:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vpCY01QoUdozp1XCabIhP6NV+vHm9NH42WR1+Brc8kY=; b=SBIA+wSDNZPs7x7h8yvxsPx3WU5Bgzlx+U44xYr1l2Ufb8Gr7o5Y1gBgREOIAY7kxj 0cqTtnJC1Pof1ox9MsySynBaHitJJQ1RHT135/k/O6/P7DUV4nLWrLGj7p/1qmSj4l75 b30VcpMCq3BojEENWyDSDKG4PevuPeuecplXLroNx2G6NPsd9vgUNw3F6HerpQWxmKNt +qnImrHIVraI8NTtz+qCGoKPpBPYxFt2xlrWSsWstbZni+GRTf9rReoL8V7XvhnqnE8D xI/pC8dvMzMdmkghgPEFq8UO34DsX3RcYuDusie60A4habsZQnVtm95C0qXNhcv/kF3F huHQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.47.200 with SMTP id f8mr14482008ign.98.1361516419971; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:00:19 -0800 (PST)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.100.207 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:00:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7E96CF2B-8DCD-4F87-97C4-CF4E1CDC2741@juniper.net>
References: <7E96CF2B-8DCD-4F87-97C4-CF4E1CDC2741@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:00:19 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MG5GjJAFgc6V9Bc9Wgd_khuUkkY
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERm6FqEHqOyJKftzOu=PJatY7F=xjCxOk7nd4PoeQdEMAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:00:21 -0000

I support the draft.

However I would like to propose a little addition the the current text
which would explicitly encourage vendors to provide "monitoring only
mode" with new or old or multiple sets of dampening parameters without
actually applying any dampening on the prefixes.

I believe that such ability to monitor prefixes subject to be dampened
would increase operator's comfort with dampening and therefor turn
positive for the stability of the routing system. It would also allow
to fine tune parameters depending on the actual AFI/SAFI or peer
subject to enabling dampening.

Regards,
R.


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:27 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have received a request for a working group last call on
> draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01. A URL for the draft is
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01
>
> Please send comments to the list by March 1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --John & Sue
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>