Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 22 February 2013 07:09 UTC
Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F1E21F8EF2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37IshCELqkHd for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804CD21F8EC6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fo12so311578lab.28 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:09:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=x88UrcEHxoLUoNot4EbYQyGp1pKPcmh/t+K/LMHBsJc=; b=j7pLqeFd7dNmhjqFQ3HzFXD3h078sV7ZSvx6oh9ov5VQev2IZ6Ahnbe4gdWd7b2pTH Bw1/HVNVCZAb/O/977wtii4g/Yqw2RRX8+cPfHThgT0IExM/epYo63hjc9TpKSNV76D6 /JbtVpccpcYPOusK4nXpiqJc+7EgeM7YBWbaX5yNfb7TlJWhRlHSgdrY6mT5+r6GPC2u fKxRy+6yolpdijpjKbItlLO0nM4WfM/c14/iOIZZW4FGWQG5iR/kGHsv/e0Cpa+t4E/z M/JUQn7tMQw5Et3PauuZoljDbeUnaK51e2ygLMv7eiACm1uBwXI6OB+HRewzVdepK1q8 n9HA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.105.244 with SMTP id gp20mr771946lab.34.1361516980325; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.86.102 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:09:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2r4k8n848.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <7E96CF2B-8DCD-4F87-97C4-CF4E1CDC2741@juniper.net> <CA+b+ERm6FqEHqOyJKftzOu=PJatY7F=xjCxOk7nd4PoeQdEMAw@mail.gmail.com> <m2r4k8n848.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:09:40 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ouGMPRjZo2yOep8ENTycdWdjCm0
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkAvVLVjtFsAaHWQSe2oSYFYEZzEE2EY8AAwdSux6TZtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:09:42 -0000
This command shows actually dampened paths. #sh ip bgp dampening ? dampened-paths Display paths suppressed due to dampening I am asking for something different .. for ability to record what would be dampened for a given set (or sets) of parameters without actually preforming dampening. In cisco both Enke and myself were recommending this mode for a long time, however my comment to include such monitoring into your draft was to raise the awareness of other people who may find such thing useful to get more comfortable with bgp dampening. Many thx, R. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote: >> However I would like to propose a little addition the the current text >> which would explicitly encourage vendors to provide "monitoring only >> mode" with new or old or multiple sets of dampening parameters without >> actually applying any dampening on the prefixes. > > if you happen to be near a crisco, try > > show ip bgp dampening dampened-paths > > i forget the juniper equivalent and do not know other vendors well at > all. > > randy > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Gaurav Dawra (gdawra)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Jon Mitchell
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Jeff Tantsura
- [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Warren Kumari
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Shishio Tsuchiya
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Seiichi Kawamura
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Balaji Pitta Venkatachalapathy (bvenkata)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Selma Yilmaz (seyilmaz)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Anoop Kapoor (ankapoor)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Pierre Francois
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-01 Susan Hares