[Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-26.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 16 June 2021 22:38 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1533A0883; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: idr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.32.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <162388313957.20355.9026142556268969024@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:38:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/QnaFJjEakhHETTVz-0k2YQUfTG4>
Subject: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-26.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:39:00 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing WG of the IETF. Title : BGP Optimal Route Reflection (BGP ORR) Authors : Robert Raszuk Bruno Decraene Christian Cassar Erik Aman Kevin Wang Filename : draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-26.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2021-06-16 Abstract: This document defines an extension to BGP route reflectors. On route reflectors, BGP route selection is modified in order to choose the best route from the standpoint of their clients, rather than from the standpoint of the route reflectors. Depending on the scaling and precision requirements, route selection can be specific for one client, common for a set of clients or common for all clients of a route reflector. This solution is particularly applicable in deployments using centralized route reflectors, where choosing the best route based on the route reflector's Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) location is suboptimal. This facilitates, for example, best exit point policy (hot potato routing). The solution relies upon all route reflectors learning all paths which are eligible for consideration. BGP Route Selection is performed in the route reflectors based on the IGP cost from configured locations in the link state IGP. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection/ There is also an htmlized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-26 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-26 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rout… internet-drafts