Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-00.txt
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 01 September 2015 18:58 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02481B2A24 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjM8jM9HsQsb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A90E81A1ABB for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10239 invoked by uid 0); 1 Sep 2015 18:58:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 1 Sep 2015 18:58:04 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id Buxv1r01L2SSUrH01uxy7C; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:58:02 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=C6F6l2/+ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=ff-B7xzCdYMA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=2clOPd4PAAAA:8 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=uH0S60oaYQL2fSOcdZMA:9 a=OgqTEuAJq3q0kW-1:21 a=WBBBk50zlJzyj3nj:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=jM_x9b4JT8QA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=STqDskTcehIGW7A2sKxbVhLpbe9MfSTIIScEM9w8Zjk=; b=gDb1zvAcrrr6BqZU2THx45/KO7Tk5W9McvfKiJk2aQ1k1cbY+Jk3JyeboJDho/KVpDq1YUr4rEW1Pfd2NsgmAd9Z+4HzHnNcjws6cyUwWYW34m6vqbRR1Pr+pe4Nlz1R;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:58154 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ZWqkn-0004fY-MH; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:57:57 -0600
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" <jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com>
References: <20150819185950.7160.20919.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55E5CA6B.1000308@labn.net> <D20B2EC6.26AC6%keyupate@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERmEEO4_6_tdih68BAjrFVOxJ-VaAuAR=Ms=zj7NdF0YiA@mail.gmail.com> <D20B4075.80BA8%jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <55E5F530.3020402@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 14:57:52 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D20B4075.80BA8%jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/X6MO1uwJkRFeK1-_wGQDgHHRoOQ>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:10 -0000
On 9/1/2015 2:48 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge) wrote: > I agree with Robert. > > Also, even though I am not aware of any implementation of the > encapsulation SAFI, We have one on top of quagga and expect to post it on gitub sometime soon. > I know a few implementations of the RFC5512 > encapsulation extended community, hence I don’t think the RFC5512 should > be obsoleted. I guess I wasn't clear. I'm only proposing deprecating encap safi (which requires 5512 to be obsoleted/replaced). All other 5512 mechanisms will need to be documented somewhere and rather than a 5512bis, I'm proposing using draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps. Lou > > Thanks. > Jorge > > -----Original Message----- > From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Robert Raszuk > <robert@raszuk.net> > Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 11:40 AM > To: "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com> > Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, > "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org" > <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-00.txt > >> Hi Keyur, Lou >> >>> That¹s a good idea. >> Well let's think about it a bit more ... >> >> BGP power is in its indirection and recursion. The native BGP >> hierarchy is a very powerful tool. Decoupling transport from >> forwarding has proven in many cases useful. >> >> Now imagine the underlay vs overlay split .. moreover imagine that my >> underlay is controlled centrally in some sort of software defined way. >> >> If we obsolete Encap SAFI in order to modify encapsulation parameters >> used by transport layer to send traffic from ingress to bgp next hop >> of the underlay I would need to readvertise all overlay routes >> (perhaps millions) with new encap attribute. /* I could perhaps try to >> readvertise the next hops but with much higher AD of IBGP those are >> not used normally for route resolution as IGP wins race to RIB. */ >> >> However with Encap SAFI I need to advertise only new parameters with >> few next hops. >> >> IMO it is not that Encap SAFI idea which is bad here. It is us - >> humans - those who did not catch up to it yet :). Note that recently >> in number of EPE discussions this in fact may be a very useful SAFI. >> >> If we depreciate it we will likely create new SAFI with new names, >> patents and new authors for doing essentially the same. >> >> So for set of applications which is not that had to imagine I would >> rather keep the encap SAFI, allow those who understand its power to >> implement it and use it while in the same time have standalone >> attribute which could be attached to any SAFI. >> >> Best, >> Robert. >> >> PS. Just to make it clear I am in no major way associated with Encap >> SAFI (except being listed in the ack section of 5512 :) >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Keyur Patel (keyupate) >> <keyupate@cisco.com> wrote: >>> Lou, >>> >>> That¹s a good idea. We authors did discuss it amongst ourselves and do >>> plan to cover it in next revision. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Keyur >>> >>> On 9/1/15, 8:55 AM, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Authors/WG, >>>> Now that we have a WG draft on this topic, I'd like to propose that >>>> this draft deprecate the Encap SAFI and obsolete/replace RFC5512. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if anyone else has implemented Encap SAFI, but we have and >>>> found it to be much more complex and limiting than just using the Encap >>>> Attribute ala the new draft. >>>> >>>> Also, I can propose specific text changes needed if the Authors wish, >>>> but I suspect they can handle this themselves! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Lou >>>> >>>> On 8/19/2015 2:59 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>>> directories. >>>>> This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group >>>>> of >>>>> the IETF. >>>>> >>>>> Title : Using the BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute >>>>> without the BGP Encapsulation SAFI >>>>> Authors : Eric C. Rosen >>>>> Keyur Patel >>>>> Gunter Van de Velde >>>>> Filename : draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-00.txt >>>>> Pages : 29 >>>>> Date : 2015-08-19 >>>>> >>>>> Abstract: >>>>> RFC 5512 defines a BGP Path Attribute known as the "Tunnel >>>>> Encapsulation Attribute". This attribute allows one to specify a >>>>> set >>>>> of tunnels. For each such tunnel, the attribute can provide >>>>> additional information used to create a tunnel and the >>>>> corresponding >>>>> encapsulation header, and can also provide information that aids in >>>>> choosing whether a particular packet is to be sent through a >>>>> particular tunnel. RFC 5512 states that the attribute is only >>>>> carried in BGP UPDATEs that have the "Encapsulation Subsequent >>>>> Address Family (Encapsulation SAFI)". This document updates RFC >>>>> 5512 >>>>> by deprecating the Encapsulation SAFI (which has never been >>>>> used),and >>>>> by specifying semantics for the attribute when it is carried in >>>>> UPDATEs of certain other SAFIs. This document also extends the >>>>> attribute by enabling it to carry additional information needed to >>>>> create the encapsulation headers additional tunnel types not >>>>> mentioned in RFC 5512. Finally, this document also extends the >>>>> attribute by allowing it to specify a remote tunnel endpoint >>>>> address >>>>> for each tunnel. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/ >>>>> >>>>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-00 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>>> submission >>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>>>> >>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> I-D-Announce mailing list >>>>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >>>>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >>>>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Idr mailing list >>> Idr@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr >> _______________________________________________ >> Idr mailing list >> Idr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-00… internet-drafts
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Lou Berger
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Lou Berger
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Lou Berger
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Lou Berger
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Eric C Rosen
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Lou Berger
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Lucy yong
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap… Lucy yong