Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-04.txt

Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com> Tue, 05 March 2024 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B7CC14F6A1; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 02:10:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Kggjn22iCF9; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 02:09:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3E0C14F69F; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 02:09:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-512f54fc2dbso4658080e87.1; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 02:09:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709633394; x=1710238194; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wPWHhhrezlTDpB1iY9cGvONjvzJFgyHY5weErHxVofQ=; b=jfnp2NPOiYenDmXtpCuqsL43g/LdxLNTdJpJUzk9fiY0uyqdcfdqRSmFJCzOXdyAsB aAdNkbEq6YE033TpX9zOKqXS+QtAOzUnygEaTN0TNri8pdDuEZqiaDKLcj7qEMiTmhf8 dYOwSG9WyPCLhlO10JItumAZU8jrLcLDqzNpXGpIQib9ylayzplZ0h2kt3f70KLZY886 RQ1194231QCrkynnPA23aOif2LW5Q6JtGWg7tC2hBTqZxVTeFCa6AXkel3jerJdQfmhu L/TtMZz3Bn4pDiJMSknUVbTUGOOaPy5QR7/d6HJ6AVkUp9PeU/KxO/arwBPyZrTLRjag OUIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709633394; x=1710238194; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wPWHhhrezlTDpB1iY9cGvONjvzJFgyHY5weErHxVofQ=; b=i/ZIF0RGQJseb90PbVOgRtgTaomWcGMg1I8IYcejR1mqnvb9ObZ/OVSqzn5W989/Je fcaAEUI4xmRH8H2RcsfXEj0cuUZwg4kxPpXtpefHw9BQyimY1ZZ/atgFN59ECekwJ5qO pKc+IJpyTIXDCvT4uzXQWofP6mIkNJ6cCBXsz8VIz4a+/0MTod4df8SctgteBnzDyQkr fZviEixFn5NFm+Od5I14f3vAT/7lkwGBgKVxK44riAg3ytE7SeUaxXQ32Vek+Edg14Ec 2C/JRlOna+hEx8FotCcsvYjyxeVUzTsCQCFAjxWQIq++n03/qrwKFiHmtVjfLGvZoKn6 TU5g==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU7czTw+bF6z9zFQ+AxC7IGiPIQ0YzXWLF3/ctmLe0sQwELzGCNcLX5KF2oEkYDANID/c6zGmVhYNq9EyLibzWVvwUbPmU=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSorTmjz38JTbctbhlMzDDFnYzKQgPb+r0CfhZmmMeo/8xRVq3 j6qOSekYG4z1Pk5BQGyPglzbjeET+CLZFlLQUMMszUrcTJrw2hwr5iU4q5+T
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IETIe6JDt2+/t8A52c329+12angV5IoQEnGS5qtdua5BLw5lsDID67KJKEMbrEU2CZ6f4afBw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:494d:0:b0:512:b517:982 with SMTP id o13-20020ac2494d000000b00512b5170982mr823177lfi.20.1709633393981; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 02:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([94.19.48.224]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17-20020a05651220d100b0051316a84295sm2091351lfr.144.2024.03.05.02.09.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Mar 2024 02:09:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <667F1B5D-68AC-410C-B490-5DD020B8D5E0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8A98DAD1-C14B-4B08-A195-0D8D22A65F9E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 13:09:42 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMH7PrQGaZ__-ZGnEmvkZWT38xuaP+fhraUtJ4C=iK=Thw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>, i-d-announce@ietf.org
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <170954803408.43395.8450424120941872596@ietfa.amsl.com> <60B94E98-3D0E-44CF-8521-96A0F217AFDA@gmail.com> <CAOj+MMH7PrQGaZ__-ZGnEmvkZWT38xuaP+fhraUtJ4C=iK=Thw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Y3hXm-QhMcNd_1pB0wAEAf4H3q0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-04.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:10:00 -0000

Hi Robert,

Yes, initially 'best external' addressed eBGP, but later it was generalized for RR clusters as well.

BR
Alexander Okonnikov

> 5 марта 2024 г., в 12:53, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> написал(а):
> 
> Alex,
> 
> The draft applies to reflected IBGP routes. 
> 
> Best external draft you are quoting - which is extremely useful and deployed proposal - is applicable to ASBRs/PEs learning BGP routes over EBGP.
> 
> Thx,
> R.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:45 AM Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com <mailto:alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi authors,
>> 
>> We have already more generic alternative for the second solution - 'Best external route' described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-best-external-05. What about choosing one of two solutions - I lean towards 'best external' based solution. It seems lightweight and doesn't require Add-paths support.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> BR
>> Alexander Okonnikov
>> 
>>> 4 марта 2024 г., в 13:27, internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> написал(а):
>>> 
>>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-04.txt is now available. It
>>> is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing (IDR) WG of the IETF.
>>> 
>>>   Title:   Extensions to RT-Constrain in Hierarchical Route Reflection Scenarios
>>>   Authors: Jie Dong
>>>            Mach(Guoyi) Chen
>>>            Robert Raszuk
>>>   Name:    draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-04.txt
>>>   Pages:   6
>>>   Dates:   2024-03-04
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> 
>>>   The Route Target (RT) Constrain mechanism specified in RFC 4684 is
>>>   used to build a route distribution graph in order to restrict the
>>>   propagation of Virtual Private Network (VPN) routes.  In network
>>>   scenarios where hierarchical route reflection (RR) is used, the
>>>   existing RT-Constrain mechanism cannot guarantee a correct route
>>>   distribution graph.  This document describes the problem scenario and
>>>   proposes a solution to address the RT-Constrain issue in hierarchical
>>>   RR scenarios.
>>> 
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr/
>>> 
>>> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-04
>>> 
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-04
>>> 
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Idr mailing list
>>> Idr@ietf.org <mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idr mailing list
>> Idr@ietf.org <mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr