Re: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 30 June 2020 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895D03A1182; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=J7DCi1yW; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=KRZgFdhV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ninqSprwRjSs; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311203A1151; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11311; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1593513267; x=1594722867; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=JBDnrjA8cmRGBGr5xZhKe6sWOnu4fATwCt5fRfUWzXs=; b=J7DCi1yWSwrEOtSV69EZjO9zRKtJatKeLbA65B52/5PWnaTrQuyijSOl wrYCNY5ogVZGSlTg+dr36hKdMXgxC+yVcJQaQZ7ga0UAw4IT/Yy6VmCiX UtlL7eI0SVuXlbn82pkAtjZlFcW05e3Nag2ZElSVkT5wgw0MRanJO1QMQ Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:B1Y26x8z4akF0v9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+7ZRaN4/l/jBnCWoCIo/5Hiu+DtafmVCRA5Juaq3kNfdRKUANNksQZmQEsQavnQU32JfLndWo2ScJFUlI2+X2pMQ5eH8OtL1HXq2e5uDgVHBi3PAFpJ+PzT4jVicn/1+2795DJJQtSgz/oarJpJxLwpgLU5cQ=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B5AAALFPte/4UNJK1gGwEBAQEBAQEBBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAYF5AwEBAQsBgSIvUQdvWC8sCoQng0YDjSYlk2+Ea4FCgRADVQsBAQEMAQElCAIEAQGERwIXghUCJDcGDgIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FWwyFbgEBAQQSCwYdAQE3AQ8CAQgOAwMBAiQHAgICMB0IAQEEAQ0FFA6DBAGBfk0DLgEOo1cCgTmIExk1doEygwEBAQWBRkGDLRiCDgMGgTgBgmiJfxqCAIE4DBCCGDU+glwCAwGBJgESAUENgmkzgi2SOYZBizWQVQqCXIhJhiuKTgMdgnOJLZJ2kVOBZIg2lD0CBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkjZnBwFTsqAYI+UBcCDY4eN4M6hRSFQnQSJQIGAQcBAQMJfI4YAYEQAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,297,1589241600"; d="scan'208,217";a="505214582"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 30 Jun 2020 10:34:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05UAYQYn018526 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:34:26 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:34:26 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:34:25 -0500
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:34:25 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=QfiC1xNS+3GFExZw6qwthwgrRywdHpt/UtPY1rtQ2WSG5HrYhpXYjCh696S68af/a8s+GuzaZlbav1QkInvvY8azOE9SbdsKWKI8prVEJFSYPPPcS3FdB10ijQQoHfo/slTqn4mtwsPEdSGASype3WirAWdJ+6QttPyjoHsPN/Sp+/yhshZmHxeplKOYMwgWIAsS8wrKkZzrEmyMqoIWSbc5qGh1FylxCrC56/RR0lYxuNsXbLXHKP7Yufk+VbED1xFt2ziMgZQQhE7R70uPCcVA6EJ8NqkYgbjcNqPgoHrEYaedX9PpRaCsOw/fSGaSPJlR1gISyNs9x9OnoAy+9g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JBDnrjA8cmRGBGr5xZhKe6sWOnu4fATwCt5fRfUWzXs=; b=PcaGb9f5A7kw+EpdxNPG6uoo+rh2j3dSRgLVFlQjMs5pAycYWn94vwDvRTeqw2h7IWLxxKad8Gq1yhJxN3EVoJX9wrJ7dNYjM5Xe2ejEYI4Cx2/j6+DQlhRIUpoi1eqasxat++SX/dQpO+pNCrzR+V5Op/mUXjV1or3ID49HiZIpm48pKgRSoKhEfl/6oXM1Le1RknPpa6rVyj/CXX6YIDgYZWEcr3ofBQnq8OMpEinyO274gev+iVYYkuZhWYy5YtbWaCeiz/N3st+rqogeWEIPMgVUZzfPo3tBDio9+QS97tjqd7r923tqJdWKLIzkxSbYrtyLEFslPRicshAfTw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JBDnrjA8cmRGBGr5xZhKe6sWOnu4fATwCt5fRfUWzXs=; b=KRZgFdhVxclOYXLq1H4y1uA0QqRrU9A2HHO83Qz6jBng3BuprX1j7adAjpINNLZ8KT8xhISvKxQBFF09kLWnrxb1eUJr06OD22PIticf1bQ9NOq0MBSdo6qYMrZKlKhRxy555J1N+MPILRcyhrBlTuexS6sA7A72jt1YjH6UT9Y=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by BY5PR11MB3879.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:18f::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.21; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:34:24 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70a6:bb5b:16b:4f9b]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70a6:bb5b:16b:4f9b%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.028; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:34:24 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update@ietf.org" <draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)
Thread-Index: AdZKjt6fvkdbRltbTAOZXPnmqDJLJQEGZ7QA
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:34:24 +0000
Message-ID: <0358A9DC-C170-4001-8E1D-A1A8A9949AE9@cisco.com>
References: <00b701d64a8e$e7196160$b54c2420$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00b701d64a8e$e7196160$b54c2420$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401
authentication-results: ndzh.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ndzh.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9809c2ba-e33d-45ee-2273-08d81ce1288f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB3879:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB387965793B07FC6076805F93C26F0@BY5PR11MB3879.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0450A714CB
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: IqNw1pNuLnj1V/mSfHSE8qxPMi8O5VA02LSmiEeOUclxvZi9zJGNqMcjvbrpIkK42VcNP/4/HKOlZNu6d2MHS1VX7liMT24sTB0icsC3KKk6P9SYkPY0kWmwFHGmod2/T6v3LR3gitcqpZQeQurXMeRnGf1zErPIgH1Nf7oAX8kJ2gKaEzvcu+OZ2yPBk6s2MSyAHkAVrxkSlLJYsW7oYBI7m8r1jh7vo65hq78v+hSX748c/2I18pl3TMK57/kZje66saFjB/Xrx5wTQZaffqotznXa3vt4XvgfsaLXPJ7AMrPAITYwEsi7NXLAOgu99WhJCRzsHbalbNZP69vDwEdi9MwvUU2stFMixV6dW6HHMcgan/wbccICrszEMlHR8tDpHNJw4RWN20ykNLTlHA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(136003)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(110136005)(15650500001)(2906002)(166002)(33656002)(53546011)(186003)(26005)(66946007)(478600001)(83380400001)(71200400001)(66476007)(66446008)(6512007)(36756003)(2616005)(316002)(64756008)(66556008)(8676002)(86362001)(6506007)(6486002)(5660300002)(966005)(4326008)(76116006)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: E0MHHMCbRAPhTw9l5kQN8Lsyma9mIfdhZPXO4deIH4bPpEa+yElZiqtFgsaAnr9jlANJBBmrFQH7T0nIKRoZrMuAHysIzdugIKDDfAuKhGg8wyUNFizs4FCcJ3iFdbQStkgpivWr4PcsOUVXDau9QwfIqI4xwJ7pS92BYUrad3oY8o5DN6qXo30DGKMRSnVGsEHG6ybxO+QmonUcytO1u2dowzfDBxTd9v/yfzyQz7yF36K0WaUrteW8Da4Mpzn+k9Zh3qWKm6UfAiJvvwa9iMOCRMOYhHDnx5g/akGWux7NGqWDhhJYNY+OkbT0y1cIAqyF0ejzA2m7GSpmk+gQzXkANgGSQP812braMQ4UhYfAvnAVjiLVmdX7te7LKR02gBEVlFJXA4JwoAMaYQTWJcv6hz9pdN1AVMVNalk1MNZUs7dQET4rcxWePyF/0yplN9cKfAoiQaqNSEt4Lo6WyphH0fj+ukLeBA89eswbVxA=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0358A9DCC17040018E1DA1A8A9949AE9ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9809c2ba-e33d-45ee-2273-08d81ce1288f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Jun 2020 10:34:24.4834 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xv0X+xnwaZKy/+HK7KvWfEFDNtymO7ZgAwsP5OrijIeZlQOPkRnzYNjzcjaCHHcw
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB3879
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ZctVDgnsYkxVjVNR-XfedE6pq8c>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:34:50 -0000

I support WG adoption. I agree with John Scudder’s comments on the draft.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 9:21 PM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update@ietf.org" <draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for:
draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01.txt

You can download the draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update/

This document updates several BGP Extended Community registries in
   order to replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in
   some entries, since their use is clearly not experimental and thus
   misleading.

This draft should be consider as part of the group of drafts that are trying to clarify and speed up the registry process.

Christoph  you should send an IPR statement regarding this draft to the IDR WG.   Since you normally prompt with your email, I am running the IPR call and WG Adoption call in parallel.

The other drafts which are in process for registry clean-up are:

1) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-09<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change/>
      John Scudder: in RFC editor’s queue
2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry/
     Adrian Farrell: In Shepherd’s queue, top of list.

These two drafts provide clean-up to the IDR capabilities and the BGP LS registry process.    This draft provides a set-up clean-up instructions for the Extended Communities registries.

Please consider if this clean-up will lessen confusion and help us streamline the process.  If you have other ideas for cleaning up the BGP registries, you are welcome to include the information on this thread.

Thank you, Sue