IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption of draft-djsmith-bgp-flowspec-oid-01 as IDR WG document

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 16 May 2012 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0B221F85F7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2012 13:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fQ2-rBUlTQNm for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2012 13:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83F421F85D9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 May 2012 13:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12390 invoked by uid 399); 16 May 2012 20:19:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.58?) (pbs:robert@raszuk.net@83.31.240.29) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTPM; 16 May 2012 20:19:11 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 83.31.240.29
Message-ID: <4FB40BC1.1070604@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:19:13 +0200
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "idr@ietf.org List" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <3BBED7A5-C064-4D80-B135-CC9B678BAF4D@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <3BBED7A5-C064-4D80-B135-CC9B678BAF4D@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption of draft-djsmith-bgp-flowspec-oid-01 as IDR WG document
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:19:13 -0000

Hi,

I support the adoption of this draft as WG document.

However the new text authors added between -00 and -01 seems too 
restrictive to the original theme/direction.

It says:

".. or the AS_PATH attribute of the flow specification is empty."

That precludes injecting and honoring the flow routes even within the 
same administrative domain in the presence of confederations.

I recommend that this limitation should be removed in next version.

Regards,
R.



> Folks,
>
> We have received a request from the authors to adopt
> draft-djsmith-bgp-flowspec-oid-01 as an IDR WG document.  Please send
> your comments to the list.  The deadline for comments is June 1, 2012
> at noon EDT.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --John _______________________________________________ Idr mailing
> list Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email