IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Comments on draft-heitz-idr-extra-extended-community-00

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 13 March 2018 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7A0120725 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6LfraJ9cdsGb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x229.google.com (mail-wr0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC2C120713 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x229.google.com with SMTP id m4so2412301wrb.7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Lo/jMWAhlTUPXXLaKjgBV/o6+Z5xKlAa/KWp0hUVSVc=; b=Tfihcmj661PGWLfAhh+2vzPuX743rIn/Gm5gpJH/J07L+BGGQeV0nC9bU0LQ+ndDTE YXYMZH+Oj443nsYvRDB/yipob6Ku1OorMuzXf5LSkkJdjXIZuFhW3QB3orHldE2a43cj R5t1+YFAQOKvtekEwtUklWTulUkEAnJGkVIpj82zb3ZP8WM71X+/vt5cSAi0D4vgthQ8 +jeEsq85AM2rMG9gH+uphj3xWHdv5tvUyswu8jE8W344LCN95FGzotJVxxAiBPhFQ0d6 1bJA02JmEOd+vJRLEu0NU7bxXYtaaCvpt8DLCjeQShDrIdX1hKOWlhpP8NafbGv2mbKU cpLA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lo/jMWAhlTUPXXLaKjgBV/o6+Z5xKlAa/KWp0hUVSVc=; b=aHQ9YIy4p+Y9tETL8y2mYF2OPodglyl5jSMJoXZWftvQaqD9MyeTBYtMnCFR7jKDqK vWmbPgzXHe/T8o1cLmTdeD8ARPf2IwJAb+PJs+diPgn0xFrZKp0UeThFYLrq25wslHGi 5Ei8wWkLQM9Ja5ieo4CvrhTGgghS3X/NZ0ZF9S9ZJLyefDDbY6uHAhw9QGPuEkuG7/ID S5n4tYtnEOWfPxY4pegsbZhOILOw9t+WI9uYqFz2ZUW96gO9xEifM0LNBpqDh/CEUPxe o0V0JHAi8PcxIHTjtHXL1x5waQ8ngFNdNxE0MSr4NVdNknPjsOsKunNSzvYpzFXbHVxo nQBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FotXBdMkuP8lxg6nEj4PBHDzpCNqq/huSNyDPA6OKLQqxbXO7b /umMa4OIKmg0DqWp/60H87qeEE9e8O+46M13/Jc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvcDsm1Hx55JCDBRyckSFDktIOJSm6q9oVfP2QLqXW0F4tzjmVLaC0XgNO9f/1CMFyAd3Xwss1xgovDlrB3++s=
X-Received: by 10.223.156.206 with SMTP id h14mr1686910wre.281.1520977578013; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.66.2 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b0aadaea-7523-2111-de7e-5e19fc400357@juniper.net>
References: <b0aadaea-7523-2111-de7e-5e19fc400357@juniper.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:46:17 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: H6fljbDCNhkLn-a2eMm0UXBKMqo
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmbsJfcSbKtsBSrXubj3nvtqwd-xM-pAEHtyRbUsKp8tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043a1a103fb9d2056752303c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hKDruKt7i5eGtE-2jnnl9uOIxTY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Comments on draft-heitz-idr-extra-extended-community-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:46:21 -0000

Hi,

In addition to Eric's observation I have only one question to authors of
this invention ...

What happens if value I need to encode is bigger then 22 octets ? Say 23,
26 or 40 octets are needed as otherwise it does not fit. It does not even
fit two IPv6 addresses .. It does not fit v6 SRH ... It does not fit fixed
set of three RTs etc ...

Will it be space for XL ext communities draft followed by XXL one ?

This magnet towards fixed size TLVs are simply AMAZING !

Cheers,
R.


On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net> wrote:

> See in-line comments in attached text file.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email