[Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (4538)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 19 November 2015 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4231B2A3E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:18:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MadXinQ1aJoV for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93681B2A3D for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 94362180009; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:17:28 -0800 (PST)
To: quaizar.vohra@gmail.com, enkechen@cisco.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, shares@ndzh.com, jgs@juniper.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20151119141728.94362180009@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:17:28 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hOMIUbwKpxHjIcJ9vjA0aQuJJLQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:28:50 -0800
Cc: idr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (4538)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:18:58 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6793,
"BGP Support for Four-Octet Autonomous System (AS) Number Space".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6793&eid=4538

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>

Section: 8

Original Text
-------------
If the BGP4-MIB [RFC4273] is supported, there are no additional
manageability concerns that arise from the use of four-octet AS
numbers, since the InetAutonomousSystemNumber textual convention
[RFC4001] is defined as Unsigned32.

Corrected Text
--------------


Notes
-----
I do not have corrected text. RFC4273 does not use InetAutonomousSystemNumber for AS numbers:
bgpPeerRemoteAs OBJECT-TYPE
            SYNTAX     Integer32 (0..65535)
            MAX-ACCESS read-only
            STATUS     current
            DESCRIPTION
                    \\"The remote autonomous system number received in
                     the BGP OPEN message.\\"
            REFERENCE
                    \\"RFC 4271, Section 4.2.\\"
            ::= { bgpPeerEntry 9 }

This uses \\"Integer32 (0...65535)\\" (note, Integer, not Unsigned Int). 
It is unclear to me how to fix this, I know some folk are simply treating it as a UInt32.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6793 (draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : BGP Support for Four-Octet Autonomous System (AS) Number Space
Publication Date    : December 2012
Author(s)           : Q. Vohra, E. Chen
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG