[Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (4538)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 19 November 2015 14:18 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4231B2A3E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:18:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MadXinQ1aJoV for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93681B2A3D for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 94362180009; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:17:28 -0800 (PST)
To: quaizar.vohra@gmail.com, enkechen@cisco.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, shares@ndzh.com, jgs@juniper.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20151119141728.94362180009@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:17:28 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hOMIUbwKpxHjIcJ9vjA0aQuJJLQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:28:50 -0800
Cc: idr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (4538)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:18:58 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6793, "BGP Support for Four-Octet Autonomous System (AS) Number Space". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6793&eid=4538 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Section: 8 Original Text ------------- If the BGP4-MIB [RFC4273] is supported, there are no additional manageability concerns that arise from the use of four-octet AS numbers, since the InetAutonomousSystemNumber textual convention [RFC4001] is defined as Unsigned32. Corrected Text -------------- Notes ----- I do not have corrected text. RFC4273 does not use InetAutonomousSystemNumber for AS numbers: bgpPeerRemoteAs OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION \\"The remote autonomous system number received in the BGP OPEN message.\\" REFERENCE \\"RFC 4271, Section 4.2.\\" ::= { bgpPeerEntry 9 } This uses \\"Integer32 (0...65535)\\" (note, Integer, not Unsigned Int). It is unclear to me how to fix this, I know some folk are simply treating it as a UInt32. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6793 (draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07) -------------------------------------- Title : BGP Support for Four-Octet Autonomous System (AS) Number Space Publication Date : December 2012 Author(s) : Q. Vohra, E. Chen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Inter-Domain Routing Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (4538) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (45… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (45… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (45… John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (45… John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (45… Enke Chen
- Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (45… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (45… Susan Hares
- [Idr] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6793 (… RFC Errata System