IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (4538)

Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com> Thu, 19 November 2015 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <enkechen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4E21B371C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:18:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYxv9mt3hdqt for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:18:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B5E1B3718 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:18:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=563; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447975110; x=1449184710; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gE4cym3zRpG/okN6Wy8BnxiC/ocG4PK7iq2C68q/p7g=; b=WsbPddU4FUsNSH2Y+5bPJvjL+RHQYz6UWIZUgvH7+MjhZzBvU/HeMYFA D90pMNyycBFFJe2s32SGri/8R9c3ViMENXzUncbSgWNkbLqNHph7hltXB Cs+96UUjrvcOXsjA7C43Vq8jt4dzfBP235mSmyKgyoM4snYuy79JU+bjo s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,319,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="46406944"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Nov 2015 23:18:29 +0000
Received: from [10.154.200.112] ([10.154.200.112]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAJNITnv030001; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:18:29 GMT
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
References: <20151119141728.94362180009@rfc-editor.org> <D273BBB7.EB02D%aretana@cisco.com> <BEC6C027-E3CA-420E-833B-94489472A14E@juniper.net>
From: Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <564E58C4.6070006@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:18:28 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BEC6C027-E3CA-420E-833B-94489472A14E@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/jjnbXnbySs5UMpZLHX8fwOJycx0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:25:30 -0800
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "quaizar.vohra@gmail.com" <quaizar.vohra@gmail.com>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6793 (4538)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:18:31 -0000

Sorry, I do not remember this detail :-(  But it certainly should 
reference a document that uses 32bit (instead of 16bit) for AS numbers.

-- Enke

On 11/19/15 3:16 PM, John Scudder wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2015, at 5:51 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
>> I wonder if the authors meant draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2 (instead of
>> rfc4273), which does use InetAutonomousSystemNumber.  If so, then that
>> would be the errata.   Enke/Quaizar?
> Since it's an informative reference and not normative, that would work I think.
>
> --John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email