[Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-01.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 25 June 2015 07:27 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682441B30C8; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dIZH8PZea5Y6; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866CD1B30D2; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.4
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150625072706.28141.96695.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:27:06 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/mzPWhIk4JbZtqQSPvzyTYVExpss>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 07:27:08 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Extensions to RT-Constrain in Hierarchical Route Reflection Scenarios
Authors : Jie Dong
Mach(Guoyi) Chen
Robert Raszuk
Filename : draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-01.txt
Pages : 6
Date : 2015-06-25
Abstract:
The Route Target (RT) Constrain mechanism specified in RFC 4684 is
used to build a route distribution graph in order to restrict the
propagation of Virtual Private Network (VPN) routes. In network
scenarios where hierarchical route reflection (RR) is used, the
existing RT-Constrain mechanism cannot build a correct route
distribution graph. This document describes the problem scenario and
proposes a solution to address the RT-Constrain issue in hierarchical
RR scenarios.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-01
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical-rr-01
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-hierarchical… internet-drafts