Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31 to 6/14)

[Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]>]

Sue,

Thank you very much for following that.

Would you permit to adjust the name of new drafts to include  -idr- so the
IETF procedures are happy with new draft names as well as WG will get auto
notification about each new rev?

When I originally proposed those documents IETF draft naming conventions
were not yet in place.

Thank you very much,
Robert


On Thursday, June 25, 2015, Susan Hares <[e-mail]> wrote:

> IDR WG:
>
>
>
> My apologies for the delay in announcing the results of this adoption call
> 10 days late (6/24).  The two drafts have been adopted by the IDR WG:
>
>
>
> draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities
>
> draft-raszuk-registered-wide-bgp-communities
>
>
>
> The authors should submit these as:
>
> draft-ietf-wide-bgp-communities
>
> draft-ietf-registered-wide-bgp-communities
>
>
>
> The comments during this adoption call encouraged the authors of these
> drafts need to engage the WG prior to IETF in a discussion of the
> simplification of the grammar.
>
>
>
> Authors should see the additional instructions below.
>
>
>
> Sue Hares
>
>
>
>
>
> New instructions for Authors:
>
> =======================
>
> The current IESG has requested that implementation reports be placed on a
> wiki instead of an internet draft for protocol drafts.  In order to speed
> up the process of collecting this information, a web page has been created
> on the IDR Working Group Wiki to record implementation reports, and
> suggestions for your draft.   Please add your comments on open issues and
> implementations
>
>
>
>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities
>
>
>
> A second web page has been created for the administrative draft:
>
>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-raszuk-registered-wide-bgp-communities
>
>
>
> Please put testimonials on why this administrative draft is needed on this
> page.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>