IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31 to 6/14)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 25 June 2015 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5A61A8894 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.054
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GOPelE_TQ9e for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FE2E1A8884 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.187.115;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Robert Raszuk' <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <006c01d0aee1$b6065f90$22131eb0$@ndzh.com> <CA+b+ERn90TLKVeRNPRYCshG9ZiBsskAKehHKX=iF4JjJPgKMqQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERn90TLKVeRNPRYCshG9ZiBsskAKehHKX=iF4JjJPgKMqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:41:07 -0400
Message-ID: <007d01d0af4c$974a5230$c5def690$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007E_01D0AF2B.103B4A40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHEbFIMBf9ndV9wuAx7jdt+rP2EhwEf3pThnczBRKA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/kL1U7oP99u1qbfCxa0S6Q_jGEj8>
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>, draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31 to 6/14)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:41:11 -0000

Robert:

 

Good catch.  I should have said 

draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities

draft-ietf-idr-registered-wide-bgp-communities 

I’ll pre-approve these documents. 

Sue Hares

 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:52 AM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: idr wg; draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31 to 6/14)

 

Sue,

 

Thank you very much for following that.

 

Would you permit to adjust the name of new drafts to include  -idr- so the IETF procedures are happy with new draft names as well as WG will get auto notification about each new rev?

 

When I originally proposed those documents IETF draft naming conventions were not yet in place.

 

Thank you very much,

Robert



On Thursday, June 25, 2015, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

IDR WG: 

 

My apologies for the delay in announcing the results of this adoption call 10 days late (6/24).  The two drafts have been adopted by the IDR WG:

 

draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities

draft-raszuk-registered-wide-bgp-communities

 

The authors should submit these as:

draft-ietf-wide-bgp-communities

draft-ietf-registered-wide-bgp-communities 

 

The comments during this adoption call encouraged the authors of these drafts need to engage the WG prior to IETF in a discussion of the simplification of the grammar.   

 

Authors should see the additional instructions below.

 

Sue Hares

 

 

New instructions for Authors: 

=======================

The current IESG has requested that implementation reports be placed on a wiki instead of an internet draft for protocol drafts.  In order to speed up the process of collecting this information, a web page has been created on the IDR Working Group Wiki to record implementation reports, and suggestions for your draft.   Please add your comments on open issues and implementations 

 

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities

 

A second web page has been created for the administrative draft: 

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-raszuk-registered-wide-bgp-communities

 

Please put testimonials on why this administrative draft is needed on this page.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email