Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31 to 6/14)
Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab@lahai.com> Tue, 02 June 2015 05:29 UTC
Return-Path: <gaurab@lahai.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EE01A0377 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UAmb6NNy-Pep for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pao.lahai.com (pao.lahai.com [206.220.230.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334BC1A026E for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from A-0584.local (88-105-83-173.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.105.83.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gaurab) by pao.lahai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4705B30C9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 05:29:32 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <556D3F3B.4020205@lahai.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:29:31 +0100
From: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab@lahai.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: idr@ietf.org
References: <006801d09c15$ba8bba30$2fa32e90$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <006801d09c15$ba8bba30$2fa32e90$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3Gf4WTCgZelL5qcaWYbRtWlStHo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31 to 6/14)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 05:29:36 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 fully support. long overdue. - -gaurab On 6/1/15 3:50 AM, Susan Hares wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for > draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities and > draft-raszuk-registered-wide-bgp-communities. These drafts can > be found at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities/ > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raszuk-registered-wide-bgp-commu nities/ > > > > > Authors (Robert Raszuk, Jeff Haas, Andrew Lange, Shane Amante, > Bruno Decraene, Paul Jakma, and Richard Steenbergen) should > indicate whether they know of any IPR. Since this proposal > relates to existing RFCs and IDR WG document > (draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-subtype-07), We have > included a bit of history below. At the 6/1/2015 interim (10:00 – > 11:30am EDT), there will be a short review of the technology and > time to discuss the draft with Robert Raszuk. > > > > Please discuss > > a) If these drafts should be adopted in addition to > draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-subtype-07, > > b) whether the new flexible format is useful for BGP > deployments, and > > c) Any technical issues on the draft. > > > > As always, indicate “support” or “no support” within the comment. > > > > Sue Hares and John Scudder > > > > ================= > > A bit of history: > > > > RFC 1997 defines the BGP Community attribute (except for 2 reserved > ranges) > > as 4 octets [2 octets AS number, 2 octets local-defined value]. > > RFC 4893 introduced 4 byte AS encoding, and suggested using > > extended communities [RFC 4360] to encoding 4 octet AS numbers. > > > > RFC5668 defines a format for a four-octet AS specific extended > > community with a designated type field, and defines two > > sub-types: Four-octet specific Route Target extended community and > > Four-octet specific Route Origin extended community. > > An IDR WG document: > draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-subtype-07 > > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-s ubtype-07) > > specifies a generic sub-type for the four-octet AS specific > extended community. > > > > 0 1 2 3 > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | 0x02 or 0x42 | 0x04 | Global | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Administrator | Local Administrator | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > Global Administrator sub-field: 4 octets > > This sub-field contains a four-octet Autonomous System number. > > > > Local Administrator sub-field: 2 octets > > This sub-field contains a value that can influence routing > > policies. This value has semantics that are of significance for > > the Autonomous System in the Global Administrator field. > > > > [From draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-subtype-07] > > > > Draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities suggests a new BGP Path > Attribute, > > that provides more flexible encoding than these WG RFCs and draft. > > > > The wide BGP header includes a Container header and community. > > The container header has: > > > > 0 1 2 3 > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Type | Flags | Hop Count | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Length | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > 0 1 2 3 > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Registered/Local Community Value | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Source AS Number | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Context AS Number | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Wide Community Target(s) TLV (optional) | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Wide Community Exclude Target(s) TLV (optional) | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > | Wide Community Parameter(s) TLV (optional) | > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > Figure 4: Wide BGP Community Type 1 > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > - -- http://www.gaurab.org.np/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlVtPzsACgkQSo7fU26F3X0DVwCcDXldltBUO1oQm1FVbUMaf2B6 fpsAn1uLO6LLes59dltcq8lqV+w4jSm4 =WdsW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31 to … Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Thomas Mangin
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Gaurab Raj Upadhaya
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Andrew Lange
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Shane Amante
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Jon Mitchell
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Shane Amante
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft (5/31… Susan Hares