Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6286 (2990)

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Mon, 20 February 2012 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A82621F8768 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:35:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8MwVcvvNqpi for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:35:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0282621F86E0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:35:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com; l=2595; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1329759327; x=1330968927; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h/NOE3CG/h5QcDY/L/MqMhIfzJWKqDyviTLm8KsLXqM=; b=gi/bikEjDohkQf2gL2TgQKFXfYtJTeJ/Xmrj5jTmapMXOKJOLx6rEOQV JT0CDK0lQQ6QbXqivfzVBCeWHcYDper/xnmNIujmGtkCr1DfdTecvd0eH LqTAqURInnY1SKwA5tmFxdq+4zY+WJQmloSORD18WSsgRiVTU4bgTUDD3 I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,452,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="66580266"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2012 17:35:25 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1KHZPe4006413; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:35:25 GMT
Received: from dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-107-136.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id q1KHZKZo000294; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:35:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4F428458.2040607@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:35:20 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <20111011082615.5835598C274@rfc-editor.org> <1527269638-1318340138-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1931111644-@b15.c6.bise6.blackberry> <20111011134114.GA13958@nic.fr> <66C9C2B7-AF86-4AE5-A739-F1C5E146ED12@amsl.com> <8F3A4088-02A0-4079-9AD3-F6D9934B5A7D@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <8F3A4088-02A0-4079-9AD3-F6D9934B5A7D@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr>, Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6286 (2990)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:35:31 -0000

I set it hold for doc update

I don't think anyone is going to get am implementation wrong
because of the typo and hold for doc update is the state that
the RFC Editor guidelines suggest in these cases.

Stewart

On 13/10/2011 17:38, John Scudder wrote:
> Stewart, can we move this to "verified" please?  It's a noncontroversial typo correction.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --John
>
> On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Alice Hagens wrote:
>
>> FYI, the report has been corrected to "In" as intended:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6286&eid=2990
>>
>> Thank you.
>> RFC Editor/ah
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:35:39PM +0000,
>>> shares@ndzh.com<shares@ndzh.com>  wrote
>>> a message of 33 lines which said:
>>>
>>>> Please confirm firs word in errata corrected text is "'in".
>>> Yes. Sorry. An error in the errata :-)
>>>
>>>
>> On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:26 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
>>
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6286,
>>> "Autonomous-System-Wide Unique BGP Identifier for BGP-4".
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6286&eid=2990
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Editorial
>>> Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer<bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr>
>>>
>>> Section: 3
>>>
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> In the AGGREAGTOR attribute of a route
>>>
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>> n the AGGREGATOR attribute of a route
>>>
>>>
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>>
>>>
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC6286 (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-identifier-14)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : Autonomous-System-Wide Unique BGP Identifier for BGP-4
>>> Publication Date    : June 2011
>>> Author(s)           : E. Chen, J. Yuan
>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
>>> Area                : Routing
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>>
>


-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html