Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6286 (2990)

[Alice Hagens <[e-mail]>]

FYI, the report has been corrected to "In" as intended:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6286&eid=2990

Thank you.
RFC Editor/ah

On Oct 11, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:35:39PM +0000,
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]> wrote 
> a message of 33 lines which said:
> 
>> Please confirm firs word in errata corrected text is "'in".
> 
> Yes. Sorry. An error in the errata :-)
> 
> 

On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:26 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:

> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6286,
> "Autonomous-System-Wide Unique BGP Identifier for BGP-4".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6286&eid=2990
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> In the AGGREAGTOR attribute of a route
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> n the AGGREGATOR attribute of a route
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6286 (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-identifier-14)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Autonomous-System-Wide Unique BGP Identifier for BGP-4
> Publication Date    : June 2011
> Author(s)           : E. Chen, J. Yuan
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>