Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS match
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 05 April 2016 14:58 UTC
Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C7D12D583 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id enUMCTECe8C0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0501C12D569 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c126so12603055lfb.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=rs57KAPBKgSpJ+Z0+HIbkwhQahmYuhO4WcxP9b/VpFo=; b=V9gGpQ4MbyF2v1jTZP2Ry7ichL9s7+FZyB6p3QivuWOE7ucgzmuRVNigUl2aiKPYx4 bb7RivVFx6sE7MuL3JwG7rnNGGAoFUoALIGJSPU+jl0jxh15lHsHh+oY5rnh8ejvZ3ir xsNKBkIKS9JK2kEPD6yJla25/jvvCQn+QzK9yhIoKnQOpCN7aBxVPf+kJWEAae7gmOZG XfyKxDC0OrHyhrabcNTahK5qXqJVbK9iCfa1sGENxfzxHsI5SM2tzxsiGh5fSTICO0qP ChxwiriJZchBcXsAu5yJ3sNGffufUv9yRejuKQr3X0QsLn8E5Kzfmc6/vAy9QEOaYXpv d0dw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=rs57KAPBKgSpJ+Z0+HIbkwhQahmYuhO4WcxP9b/VpFo=; b=S08ZFTjmYaM4F+NFnyHA9C2vYviOgpEW6FISHAluNXpiWvhsB/u1JtuSJzE8P3kjl6 xIV1465f5LCE0K6Gz/Ahg3JQh3YYm67tJsPeHSlaGjQgmF8gEwJcFecKTrbbrSjJD9oz 74TVRNFrn4NSPWDYEd5IgsPhLjwE3GK20hnachC9XFKJh7MOeqpsDR2tlqaVZfnSIWGt 7bi+psFkM/ENmRWuRjLI93pt5KlsStzAnmrYyXiIXTwfLchEseE9nRitZrAjJMczgpEC 9O8zmsdu8pj7Ph7B+/HTANPdkPBJB+m4J67h99MGcZG3sHYpHO5+0uHSrv4lxab3bRco dstA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJn48aCajR6uwaHdrrMyuv0S6lAjju5dqd1OIhAuv4SLwF3KMU58giSF/8qWGrgoylklGwViq/Gv55Qzg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.207.76 with SMTP id f73mr5726733lfg.11.1459868269172; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.136.133 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.136.133 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <00d301d18f46$bf49e9f0$3dddbdd0$@ndzh.com>
References: <00d301d18f46$bf49e9f0$3dddbdd0$@ndzh.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:57:48 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ay5Q3Iq0Km1IJmvku6LoX7G0_YY
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkizc5hfsPuvV-wKV0Bu8uLCwtHcCZRreMhjb0jsuvtgQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141234e9a6004052fbe1133"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/u6e66EUMy0Go4T_qi1mk1PQtud4>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS match
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:58:01 -0000
Sue, Eric asked the question assuming classic dynamically assigned mpls labels. He was right that for those it does not make sense to do any match on 20 bits But here we are talking about static labels, option B labels, SR labels etc .... Thx, R. On Apr 5, 2016 4:24 PM, "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: > Eric: > > > > The BGP filters were packet matching filters. What I understood is your > filters are based on FEC configured locally rather than something in the > packet? Is this correct? > > > > Do you want a FEC to be tested locally? Should it be added? Does the > other L2/L3 filters approximate your FEC filters? > > > > Sue > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > >
- Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS m… Robert Raszuk
- [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS match Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS m… Susan Hares