Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS match
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 05 April 2016 15:13 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A91E12D110 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.739
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOdSd5whyVic for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0DE12D188 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=31.133.178.123;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Robert Raszuk' <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <00d301d18f46$bf49e9f0$3dddbdd0$@ndzh.com> <CA+b+ERkizc5hfsPuvV-wKV0Bu8uLCwtHcCZRreMhjb0jsuvtgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkizc5hfsPuvV-wKV0Bu8uLCwtHcCZRreMhjb0jsuvtgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:12:05 -0400
Message-ID: <014f01d18f4d$84fe5810$8efb0830$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0150_01D18F2B.FDEFC550"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHb5wK2PjQjDd8fmTK8UAlgzq92pADWfCasn2AYxjA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/KKpCyx4tvgOBeDJcy0MZVCGpU5c>
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS match
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:13:01 -0000
Robert: Thank you. Jeff made the point on static routes. The draft authors thank both you and Jeff for the clarification. Sue From: rraszuk@gmail.com [mailto:rraszuk@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 10:58 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: idr wg Subject: Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS match Sue, Eric asked the question assuming classic dynamically assigned mpls labels. He was right that for those it does not make sense to do any match on 20 bits But here we are talking about static labels, option B labels, SR labels etc .... Thx, R. On Apr 5, 2016 4:24 PM, "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: Eric: The BGP filters were packet matching filters. What I understood is your filters are based on FEC configured locally rather than something in the packet? Is this correct? Do you want a FEC to be tested locally? Should it be added? Does the other L2/L3 filters approximate your FEC filters? Sue _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS m… Robert Raszuk
- [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS match Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Question for Eric Osborne on the MPLS m… Susan Hares