Re: [Idr] 答复: WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Tue, 05 April 2016 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C9D12D157 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dc8tV9tjBh1l for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AED0F12D592 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CGX37337; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:27:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.225) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:27:33 +0100
Received: from DFWEML501-MBB.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.179]) by dfweml706-chm ([10.193.5.225]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:27:25 -0700
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Youjianjie <youjianjie@huawei.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] 答复: WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016
Thread-Index: AQHRjyB0snbvDbvqJEm1zryIZdP5tJ97gPlA
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:27:25 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657E6A33D@dfweml501-mbb>
References: <000401d186a5$38fac760$aaf05620$@ndzh.com> <F6C28B32DA084644BB6C8D0BD65B669DBDF595@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <F6C28B32DA084644BB6C8D0BD65B669DBDF595@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.197.142]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657E6A33Ddfweml501mbb_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.5703D966.00FE, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 47de9adbafb2d68975ac9bf2d447382f
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/2UreQzQ5bYBQIam6NdgjbfMsCpI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 答复: WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:27:45 -0000

Hi Sue, John,

I support adoption of followings:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eddy-idr-flowspec-packet-rate/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-idr-bgp-flowspec-label/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-idr-flowspec-interfaceset/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yong-idr-flowspec-mpls-match/

These drafts proposed useful FS extensions. btw I echo Lucy¡¯s comments on FS-redirect drafts.

Linda Dunbar

·¢¼þÈË: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] ´ú±í Susan Hares
·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2016Äê3ÔÂ25ÈÕ 22:47
ÊÕ¼þÈË: 'idr@ietf. org'
Ö÷Ìâ: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016

IDR WG:

This begins a 2 week WG Call (3/25 to 4/8/2016) for the set of drafts to be considered in RFC5575 additions. These options are filters, actions or critical security additions.  The flow specification work has been a part of the interims since IETF 94
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/02/08/idr/proceedings.html
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/03/07/idr/proceedings.html

There will be a brief flow specification presentation at IETF 95, and the email list has select to start with option 1 ¨C extending RFC5575.  We also will be gathering details on the SDN/NFV use case for option 2 (new NLRI and Wide Communities support).

This is a group call for the drafts to be considered in the flow specification work.  For each of the drafts you wish to be considered Option 1, please indicate:


1)      If this option is valuable for the DDoS deployments or another critical deployments,

2)      Do you feel this draft is useful, but not ready for adoption,

3)      Do you feel this draft is a good start for this work.

The drafts to consider are:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eddy-idr-flowspec-packet-rate/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-redirect-tunnel/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized-sid/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-idr-bgp-flowspec-label/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-idr-flowspec-interfaceset/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yong-idr-flowspec-mpls-match/

And for the ordering of these filters and actions drafts ¨C the Option 1 section out of this
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-idr-flowspec-combo/
(A revised draft with just Option 1 will be posted)

Sue Hares and John Scudder