Re: [Idr] BGP MIBv2 implementations
Vincent GILLET - Orange - France Telecom <vgi@zoreil.com> Thu, 22 March 2007 17:32 UTC
Return-path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUR9j-0006Uw-Lk; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:32:55 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUR9h-0006Qh-F6 for idr@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:32:53 -0400
Received: from utopia.opentransit.net ([193.251.151.78]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUR9T-0003fa-2O for idr@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:32:53 -0400
Received: from utopia.opentransit.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by utopia.opentransit.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l2MHWWPk010767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:32:33 +0100
Received: (from vgi@localhost) by utopia.opentransit.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2MHWPOv010766; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:32:25 +0100
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:32:25 +0100
From: Vincent GILLET - Orange - France Telecom <vgi@zoreil.com>
To: Susan Hares <skh@nexthop.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] BGP MIBv2 implementations
Message-ID: <20070322173224.GA10666@opentransit.net>
References: <6F44D7F6B24A8F4DA0AB46C9BE924F0209F9BBE7@VS4.EXCHPROD.USA.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6F44D7F6B24A8F4DA0AB46C9BE924F0209F9BBE7@VS4.EXCHPROD.USA.NET>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (utopia.opentransit.net [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:32:33 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc: idr@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org
skh@nexthop.com disait : > If anyone has implemented any portion of the BGP MIBv2, would you please > send mail to the mail list > > Indicating: > > > > 1) What you've implemented > > 2) What's useful. We (France telecom) are using BGPMIBv2 implemented by Juniper year ago in their .enterprise. node (1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2....). It is working just fine and bring feature we were missing in legacy mib : . accepted prefixes . sent prefixes. We monitor hundreds box running full bgp routing (Juniper, Cisco, IOX) and are happy to monitor these counters on Juniper. We are really missing such data from other vendor. It also provide v6 flavour we are missing. Without such MIB, we are currently using telnet to monitor ipv6 session :-( Monitoring via telnet is done once a day whereas SNMP run every 5 minutes. Just to let you know that we are happy with this new MIB implemented in Juniper Private area. This MIB in "standard" tracks would help for widely implementation. Vincent. _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] BGP MIBv2 implementations Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] BGP MIBv2 implementations Vincent GILLET - Orange - France Telecom
- Re: [Idr] BGP MIBv2 implementations Simon Leinen