IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Pete Resnicks Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158A11A883F; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:59:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.055
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.055 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30SEb5IpzoWN; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8C91A8820; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:59:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.92;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>
References: <ouvqvstjq0yjnm8cfv0fwext.1424351342995@email.android.com> <005e01d04c49$ad2e9860$078bc920$@ndzh.com> <m24mqi7yna.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m24mqi7yna.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:59:15 -0500
Message-ID: <00d901d04c54$a12c8e40$e385aac0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQJK187CqHrtHxQGy0IoA9qcdcpAOgKJNQbqAbF6uWCb4SGf4A==
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/vDBeWlKSKxsCgSE6FLkUqjrrPec>
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>, 'Pete Resnick' <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Pete Resnicks Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:59:28 -0000

Randy:

Yes, if we revise this draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03 we should probably
revise the second.  

As the reviewer of the draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration, I did not have the same
concerns as Alvaro or Adrian. It would be good to get their input on these
drafts.   

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:40 AM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: idr wg; Pete Resnick; The IESG
Subject: Re: [Idr] Pete Resnicks Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03:
(with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> We debated the bcp versus the rfc.  The problem is that these behavior 
> change the fundamental assumptions that bgp in a way that impacts 
> sidr.

and there is a corresponding, equally over-wordy, companion draft in sidr.

randy

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email