Re: [Idr] Frequency of Route Advertisement.
"Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li> Fri, 28 March 2008 06:41 UTC
Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2C93A6C41; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELN4Fcbhh-Tf; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29EE3A6C5F; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58E13A679C for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ACIPDadZwQnF for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1F63A69DA for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6VkN1Z0010bG4ec5404Z00; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:40:26 +0000
Received: from TONYLTM9XP ([24.6.155.154]) by OMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6Whi1Z0033L8a8Q3P00000; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:41:43 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=R9f1EQQoLzUiqpE_a7EA:9 a=iCIzv5iYChmkxZ33o10A:7 a=aJa3d_Car8wEIUarOy3g3g347HYA:4 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=gJcimI5xSWUA:10 a=I6w1q-7Qvym-sx8BbcQA:9 a=HjXcBHpBZcpNi2u8dP4A:7 a=iasuaEIQtfmLPlB1t0xdIs6drLkA:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
To: 'Jithu Arun Sreedhar' <jithuarun@gmail.com>, idr@ietf.org
References: <cf2df5d0803272322o17914c56vd0c6d368e61d7b9a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:41:24 -0700
Message-ID: <027701c8909e$beb3dc30$bb2b359b@ad.redback.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <cf2df5d0803272322o17914c56vd0c6d368e61d7b9a@mail.gmail.com>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Thread-index: AciQnCuMn4ncuA77ToutzTTIuthjiwAAmjzQ
Subject: Re: [Idr] Frequency of Route Advertisement.
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tony.li@tony.li
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0271579404=="
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Yes, withdraws should be propagated immediately. However, the generation of a withdrawl should then subsequently be considered as similar to an advertisement in whatever mechanism you use for avoiding subsequent flap. Tony _____ From: idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jithu Arun Sreedhar Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:23 PM To: idr@ietf.org Subject: [Idr] Frequency of Route Advertisement. Hi With reference to the BGPv4 RFC's, the RFC 4271 has been modified from the RFC 1771, including the withdraw routes in the procedure to control route advertisement frequency. I would like to know :- 1) Shouldnt we advertised the withdrawn routes as soon as possible to aviod black-holes (as identified in the RF1771) ?. 2) Was this change made in light of more frequent route flapping causing withdrawal of routes than actual route withdrawal occuring? Jithu Arun
_______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] Frequency of Route Advertisement. Jithu Arun Sreedhar
- Re: [Idr] Frequency of Route Advertisement. Tony Li