[Idr] A question about relationship between draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework and draft-wang-idr-bgp-ifit-capabilities
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 23 August 2021 03:53 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9F23A13F7; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t_zG_xG7JVgQ; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0F33A13F5; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id d6so24129370edt.7; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=B4/1wNH7x7FRVTQufiCIjk++O9MQXG4Jkxc8Jdn/PDw=; b=kguEnHroQNPX3y15dJ70AtGuzfvjtUSeqStkJhhOMMPrHGNTSp2kiSLJthTcL9W3pp 6Upo9V7sHvvqv8DuhnI/RFQ4T3KW79n65YtmpzcKuN/0w04gHP/GR63EL2pA8N5tIFpX ETX6XLh4UP8DaVmUhbtvBmiDoXAThbURy+Vf7Og4MXe+vzRmjnhAyzT9xts/FNUef9hX PrvsENMGBT3erHXJsBXW4JxVsHUVw7yRPx9xwQtyGN1fFPcR8FJOyro/7CHphnDsFZRk 1USOc3P81TMc5I8+3irP2QFsLtV/NrWuI5kRf++LY6EeCnvhgmMubLwAZ0CeIqftSVf8 EeJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=B4/1wNH7x7FRVTQufiCIjk++O9MQXG4Jkxc8Jdn/PDw=; b=uWTF1J0WmpUuJuUHEAKz4MqDEqmgGVGonXlxIgsYjvay8nTYKP/+vnsPJKbmo0cKBT deJI4SpxBYVyi1mziBZ88/D+e4Tp5qThGpqSf7g8CIklVrXrPLS3kI345TZMCXhZcltK PRVmhgJjeFwzLzH3m8DzvgMeKcjNe6ZIfIh+B6jpOW/qz5K8xqFl427wG//tObUcj7mG 7DKBcFRr3AFNhrPTKvwxfyIVQxXD9gCm/m4GFX2GdpPLePUOd4QTtKkuL3D0BnJ9k9pu g+8Nq4YY+o0TC/4FaP/9rjMnOiCcEaRcGUodFABIircOBgwWhoJgfTsHpQmT4UpwG1BD /jNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tnWdAw51ZNmxfvR1pFbDdjXsnnNyNNj1IidqKUR+Ph2E5StY7 rNVZP6elEEKa1y8FAUdoPdqSm1EdPy2p+jKyvGlEXHplkBU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNGtClaxLfGUjntwrzupI/xXTCuFoVIocLFb0v8LRkzeIdHf9PgsKWxGKFcoF8O04hHZaOErYOersS3tXDTWc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5192:: with SMTP id q18mr34785534edd.149.1629690810654; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:53:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUg8T3QUeatKB6-hyUR=7dGeAJvkgWBFygyNDv+6JddzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dce59b05ca31f583"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/x51_TxKVrJ83Yi2rl-di6HsC2S8>
Subject: [Idr] A question about relationship between draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework and draft-wang-idr-bgp-ifit-capabilities
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 03:53:40 -0000
Dear OPSAWG and IDR WGs, I've been following the discussion of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/> in the OPSAWG. The on-path telemetry is a very important element of the OAM toolset. The IFIT framework discussion is helping to better understand how the op-path telemetry can help operators. As you can see, that document is not yet been adopted by the WG. I've read draft-wang-idr-bgp-ifit-capabilities and have noticed that though it defines elements of the control plane for the IFIT, it does not reference the IFIT Framework document. That seems like an unfortunate omission. Also, it might be appropriate to get the IFIT framework progressed before advancing documents on the control plane extensions supporting functionalities defined in the framework. What are your opinions? Regards, Greg
- [Idr] A question about relationship between draft… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Idr] [OPSAWG] A question about relationship … Tianran Zhou