Re: [Idr] Tunnel-Encap Gaps for SD-WAN described in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis-02.txt

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Wed, 26 June 2019 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67901201E9; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GV0XV8rGNOZx; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78E36120099; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108159.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5QME2Tf001650; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:16:45 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=J+k6zxYYDTyPTBgWoZMhZ1s0d+m2kKBjaxjTV5rzk+k=; b=TbIMD8YNRqODgUYZBmakEE0AxnOqVXxYrYvXS1CDVJEPkam+y9ZjLwawrCWWS/ZZpO4M /0b9+mzOk2oywzujL6s763I1aweSocH19i4z64KZPKw/O/JuFTgJYiBgeEwKf4sNMHJ5 uOCw7vTt43D/OOTB1mEHfBeQm57tE+t7I0ciJQSUpym83FlFcQpgp+X4Rc4TT/kiSziY bnk7meVzoKVczKL7BtXrGtL4MNPFaUlOmf9x1dx3gHPHJjDLTJJr70zUmLyjL82HK+wg +iuLQLVsE1cttDUUggHv7G+6Zy/l6jdg16fbXHVAtYjf9a1j9NECOUKMcDw3qHonOBFo aQ==
Received: from nam05-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam05lp2052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.50.52]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tcgya015y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:16:45 -0700
Received: from DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.109.215) by DM6PR05MB5468.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.122.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2008.13; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:16:44 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1549:ffd0:8373:4593]) by DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1549:ffd0:8373:4593%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2032.012; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:16:44 +0000
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, John E Drake <jdrake=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Tunnel-Encap Gaps for SD-WAN described in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis-02.txt
Thread-Index: AdUm2V3OpdsU1OeER3S07GObn2sxqQAuM8HQAAeqFDAAAhbNoAAAx2nAAB0KTXAAA76b8AECmC2AAACO5/AAAFwXAAAFHBggAAE65kAAAL+sAAAAvy6A
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:16:43 +0000
Message-ID: <C795CBDE-CB3F-45BD-B08B-D937082029D4@juniper.net>
References: <MN2PR13MB358267E50BCEB2E7795046B785E50@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB5029672CA347E6EC1B94E476C7E40@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB358228DB2D7DD56204660F6985E40@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB502933857FE0AFBA3390734DC7E40@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB3582B880C792E0519A3A91C385E40@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB5029581D97C82FA968601CCDC7E70@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB35826741E00B40BBFE12616085E70@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4F580631-0E2D-4311-9EDC-E25A4862DD84@juniper.net> <BYAPR05MB5029D7B984EB0506C7773E63C7E20@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMH-0qBkaroKJEdtjM1-7-ZjOY1mWBkS7hLo8FOC_5A+Og@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR05MB50295A1AC3FB482F39249D0AC7E20@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB3582DDE034FA9E1C1D4970CD85E20@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMEQC8Cv4m7DzG3jaqATaTTNSW7vReVHh5Zt8oTsH4Cf4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEQC8Cv4m7DzG3jaqATaTTNSW7vReVHh5Zt8oTsH4Cf4g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.15]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0f872b86-4395-4c21-5391-08d6fa83f8cd
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR05MB5468;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB5468:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB5468604C1D65B8518A97F5FEAAE20@DM6PR05MB5468.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6790;
x-forefront-prvs: 00808B16F3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(6116002)(6486002)(73956011)(66556008)(66476007)(54906003)(236005)(36756003)(54896002)(86362001)(68736007)(64756008)(6916009)(7736002)(6512007)(66946007)(3846002)(66066001)(8676002)(91956017)(76176011)(99286004)(5660300002)(2616005)(2906002)(6246003)(25786009)(316002)(26005)(71200400001)(478600001)(76116006)(66446008)(53546011)(4326008)(81166006)(6506007)(53936002)(558084003)(6436002)(8936002)(14454004)(33656002)(229853002)(446003)(476003)(11346002)(256004)(186003)(71190400001)(486006)(102836004)(81156014); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR05MB5468; H:DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Ly5vKM4FonsjLbAP/hopJW+/+iKrRYFjE6jGVzbfD+nRBCTHz/H9qkkCVOzzY11Haz53GZRoBWlWm3uzlQcN00Pd7b3OMpFdAvisLxR0YJh6tGDvPUlawhHy8G/kjpI5KjrSPrxTwHnLKOSYtWdYN7GC6BljfIRZ7Es4bcSJY4l+f4CcTmAiOtANkrgr7QDS5yiaYF8Y072RcJ1F5jruO1I+4uNCtnBLdf/NNclDuJtXvPu8eSDoHpS/6Erj5dAB3/0wBO3NBiiyybVzTVMzS28m30q3VFcARGLnsppySuNjLuFgUZHBH/k/d9tOo9AgaWa25a+FrwCP7tWNxvL0FAn5J23j68Vq/PF2LKoU/q8E8fgPnF+2VuxmyjFbgQDgPcaCJILUQg/Sl0Wno7XAOb7eu8FxO79cMkhWt6x3tEg=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C795CBDECB3F45BDB08BD937082029D4junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0f872b86-4395-4c21-5391-08d6fa83f8cd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Jun 2019 22:16:43.9810 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jgs@juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB5468
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-06-26_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=634 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906260254
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/x77nwZ4_CHBiRxyrSbs91Va0Qdk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Tunnel-Encap Gaps for SD-WAN described in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:37:08 -0000

On Jun 26, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> wrote:

There is nothing in the spec however which would stop basic recursion to work including recursion via next hop which can be reached via some form of encapsulation.

Agreed.

—John