IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] BGP Message level ACKs

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 08 March 2023 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B7DC151546 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 07:24:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YtriWkjOJ9ZC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 07:24:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19259C151551 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 07:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id bg16-20020a05600c3c9000b003eb34e21bdfso1594301wmb.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 07:24:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; t=1678289082; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Dyc1shTSYyVfN8lajDvyGGboR0j8v+OrHHcq2cHE0/g=; b=Qb5OV/hU5IAdMGU3zbTNaeLrvuiBqC+hLisTUMIpmOVGoG4kakWoh292TnsKsLUKPT f2oElgtCmiNzeZT7iOyXlozReDf8C8VVoxZTt+0ZdZM8MGc1ctpRmHe3PPkQpFaqtfKw s2mI8qHC+xinjDnBSsQFTldcG5/npeYgT/uRlkVA4pyKVdXvcr/8Fp2PPPtMOirx9E4R ElklP5lS/jDiGmYYATM2UjRBoVPachPLFP9Ry4PxZ1m+uxX8Z+FNm0xquesKYgug0v+z bluvtMo6UYwt9BJmP9g0bZp1IwcT1+z6i8wI/Z9aP9HP93NUcdUsyQGje+ltSDrXRvLT XxgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678289082; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Dyc1shTSYyVfN8lajDvyGGboR0j8v+OrHHcq2cHE0/g=; b=SbPpNafbpG1ei3FRqZ7x2AVIqcLnunlFMuYuZP6LWBYYTcO25y9YyIPxpt7dgstUxJ wfO8yNB6DUZuHucMAXoqanoe8UguiY1DWNC9cIGROKyj0eM69BJb8BhQyyN71jUOoDJ7 Bu4WLWiNHmn5cgCgT7zFfwovxsTMAsHocdIDWEn12nUu57h62q7RB8aUdPfwAAJhlD4T BjwEjF1kYTQGEX8t+Gi7xLT7dNrqT31SLJFOcxdE7ZYCwAUPyfnzbcAXdpYLbE12MnJS 3haaVo41FfPvXao2Vvt+R4bv9dfWvJqgJ6NuP5VQvfjGrZkWgWGkZfaCkh6EC6+8gfIK Ssig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWf3qXfu2/M3fpdZwxonaO74EvBGjpPtkqiass5pEGgo3PlhcL9 yvsugxOq67yUit1e8cwaf9BpQEvr4GyzoP8yHhNHwi9RhZTnNeA3X1g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+rUHTSkGrvPAPQ4L9+xeECOqz2ng/jkQdjRmvXQbecTHtV+fz+erE17/vOHXkV2Pe7dPt7qj0IZqb2GxgFHLA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e20:b0:3df:97a1:75e8 with SMTP id ay32-20020a05600c1e2000b003df97a175e8mr8485124wmb.0.1678289082366; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 07:24:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 16:24:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MME+xOzrA3e1CKmHR2JC+fiWkV4LinuL5ovA3L0tRWORRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000095cf8105f665200d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/xYYDLMjIYx3_YNJaAQVgpRN_DDI>
Subject: [Idr] BGP Message level ACKs
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:24:49 -0000

Hi,

Let me start a complete new thread on this.

Jeff well said in the discussion about sendhioldtimer:

"Addressing "has the application consumed the data it was sent" is out of
scope here.  If you want it in scope, you'll require an explicit BGP ACK
message."

So what would WG think about adding it to BGP ? While perhaps a terrible
idea in the light of sendholdtimer topic and using TCP as a transport,
perhaps not so bad in the light of using UDP transport for BGP (for
example: native QUIC (not a reliable session mode or the like)).

And if so the side effect of it may be a solution to current problems some
folks are reporting ...

Do not recall if it was ever discussed before.

Thx,
R.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status