IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ieee-ietf-coord] requesting an EtherType

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Fri, 23 September 2016 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773F112BE45; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJ0EHqYEAkHR; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF9412BE1D; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t67so119779594ywg.3; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p884193+pyCqqEcyTPB7v7TY3hzjGg/8rUUz+2kaKqY=; b=Qoo/QrRe2r84OeVTykzQRMJp/O7in8S/yDu0CgUzdWMeohdxYts0ZY01lCSmTJMuBt 2DezP2AKSZnIlSmAca3hdZc29hu7s8Bg8ViHsXkMvPcVUbrDMkFpEgES+FmQJUD+/4AV dRslrZrCh1PBxqRpupDce/nfDRZ6fKiPOHJuviN5GJv+Uc9WhqAa6k2iN6CYYzCnPQZu mXQGJXReWMgDqLElu5aSEzlz/U5mpvpO9Kmo6IMhTiwI1RSamdX0PYRjT7RkVjbSHXx3 gPGAqo5ahcz6KY8aNpVQAARBGTC9Kr2XOzG9/6ZU9sD/Yl2aYRgEHDHX4Efw+9iNIlaN X2PA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p884193+pyCqqEcyTPB7v7TY3hzjGg/8rUUz+2kaKqY=; b=JtV5LuixuPJi7bZo5OTofcy6JbYTPuaxgiUgAaF+8mzO1ZYqwe3dx0lENWkdKvEIIa G9a3Z6mcDSRl1HCs3R3I5xMs1kKfweTDDwQoli4B2M7s24t70nExiW7M4oRkrCtuws6R At3HRCmK0AiwZw0XI2yuo9Xkc5cHXPfx4i/v+dF9qqAm37N+PlkEsdvLixcFIJU2subH lZELOMTEHsg+FsBux5pzuQ2G7Zme7VtUXv0O3y3EHEj/1ZRndhmsZ9OxwyHjO3yyhRHL LE2p5d4lTrLDo4NYNYVcDBCyRNA/JGn0lpkJZMd0maExZWwFbh9nq1kaECRl2nWYuatQ fGdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwO0T+Ovx3PQVn4eIz9cDohO7YJ8qeB/4zstAhGbZgYYRV+Phr9RLdcNfXX+T/cibvVWe5vH9xX8GL//bg==
X-Received: by 10.129.50.201 with SMTP id y192mr6855302ywy.136.1474653464025; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.56.132 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:57:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rcF9PfaAJnJ2Rp85sMwgk1TiHXSXmFLthLwfqj-wR889g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org" <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114092dee3e08c053d3083b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/kN6t-JNShI8c5jJKzbXHE0YKgGg>
Cc: draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb@ietf.org
Subject: [ieee-ietf-coord] requesting an EtherType
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:57:46 -0000

Hi,

A document, draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb-06
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb/>, was
approved by the IESG for publication and is in the RFC Editor queue.

I had assumed that the EtherType request would be made as part of the
processing, as per https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ethertypes.html.
That appears to not be the case.

What is the correct procedure for officially requesting the EtherType so
that this document can finally be published?

Thanks,
Alia

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email