[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for July 19, 2007

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Thu, 12 July 2007 22:53 UTC

Return-path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I97XZ-0000c6-NP; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:53:41 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I97XY-0000bw-Ju for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:53:40 -0400
Received: from ns4.neustar.com ([156.154.24.139]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I97XW-0003lM-Mf for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:53:40 -0400
Received: from stiedprstage1.ietf.org (stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com [10.31.47.10]) by ns4.neustar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB6C2AC9B for <iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:53:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ietf by stiedprstage1.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I97XR-0008Lw-BO for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:53:33 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Cc:
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E1I97XR-0008Lw-BO@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:53:33 -0400
X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 9cc83ac38bbbabacbf00f656311dd8d8
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for July 19, 2007
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1988822786=="
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org

IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-07-19).


1. Administrivia

    1.1 Roll Call
    1.2 Bash the Agenda
    1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
    1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RAIIPv6 Transition in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2303&filename=draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
RAIConnection Establishment in the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/puFrom%20iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org%20Thu%20Jul%2012%2018:53:43%202007%0AReturn-path:%20<iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org>%0AReceived:%20from%20[127.0.0.1]%20(helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)%0A%09by%20megatron.ietf.org%20with%20esmtp%20(Exim%204.43)%0A%09id%201I97XZ-0000c6-NP;%20Thu,%2012%20Jul%202007%2018:53:41%20-0400%0AReceived:%20from%20[10.90.34.44]%20(helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)%0A%09by%20megatron.ietf.org%20with%20esmtp%20(Exim%204.43)%20id%201I97XY-0000bw-Ju%0A%09for%20iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org;%20Thu,%2012%20Jul%202007%2018:53:40%20-0400%0AReceived:%20from%20ns4.neustar.com%20([156.154.24.139])%0A%09by%20chiedprmail1.ietf.org%20with%20esmtp%20(Exim%204.43)%20id%201I97XW-0003lM-Mf%0A%09for%20iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org;%20Thu,%2012%20Jul%202007%2018:53:40%20-0400%0AReceived:%20from%20stiedprstage1.ietf.org%20(stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com%0A%09[10.31.47.10])%20by%20ns4.neustar.com%20(Postfix)%20with%20ESMTP%20id%208DB6C2AC9B%0A%09for%20<iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>;%20Thu,%2012%20Jul%202007%2022:53:33%20+0000%20(GMT)%0AReceived:%20from%20ietf%20by%20stiedprstage1.ietf.org%20with%20local%20(Exim%204.43)%0A%09id%201I97XR-0008Lw-BO%0A%09for%20iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org;%20Thu,%2012%20Jul%202007%2018:53:33%20-0400%0AMime-Version:%201.0%0ATo:%20iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org%0ACc:%20%0AFrom:%20IESG%20Secretary%20<iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>%0AMessage-Id:%20<E1I97XR-0008Lw-BO@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>%0ADate:%20Thu,%2012%20Jul%202007%2018:53:33%20-0400%0AX-Spam-Score:%201.7%20(+)%0AX-Scan-Signature:%209cc83ac38bbbabacbf00f656311dd8d8%0ASubject:%20[IESG-AGENDA-DIST]%20IESG%20Telechat%20Agenda%20(HTML)%20for%20July%2019,%202007%20%0AX-BeenThere:%20iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org%0AX-Mailman-Version:%202.1.5%0APrecedence:%20list%0AList-Id:%20Distribution%20of%20IESG%20agendas%20<iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>%0AList-Unsubscribe:%20<https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>,%0A%09<mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>%0AList-Archive:%20<http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>%0AList-Post:%20<mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>%0AList-Help:%20<mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>%0AList-Subscribe:%20<https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>,%0A%09<mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>%0AContent-Type:%20multipart/mixed;%20boundary=" rel="nofollow">
IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-07-19).


1. Administrivia

    1.1 Roll Call
    1.2 Bash the Agenda
    1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
    1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RAIIPv6 Transition in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2303&filename=draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
RAIConnection Establishment in the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2411&filename=draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Adam Roach is the PROTO Shepherd Note to SEC ADs for IESG review: We need to look at IPv6 addresses and certificates in this draft. May result in some small changes to document.
Token: Cullen Jennings
TSVRaptor Forward Error Correction Scheme for Object Delivery (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptor-object-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptor-object-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2448&filename=draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptor-object" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
TSVApplying Signaling Compression (SigComp) to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-sip-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-sip-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2451&filename=draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-sip" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
RAIRejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2465&filename=draft-ietf-sip-acr-code" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: The document shepherd is Dean Willis. Note IETF LC ends the day of the call.  Cullen will hold discuss on waiting for LC comments.
Token: Cullen Jennings
2.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
INTDHCP Server Identifier Override Suboption (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1911&filename=draft-ietf-dhc-server-override" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Bringing this document back to agenda, hopefully with the past issue solved
Token: Jari Arkko

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item [Open Web Ballot]
      AreaDate
OPSMar 8Email Submission Operations: Access and Accountability Requirements (BCP) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hutzler-spamops-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-hutzler-spamops-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1714&filename=draft-hutzler-spamops" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Adam Roach is the PROTO Shepherd Note to SEC ADs for IESG review: We need to look at IPv6 addresses and certificates in this draft. May result in some small changes to document.
Token: Cullen Jennings
TSVRaptor Forward Error Correction Scheme for Object Delivery (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptor-object-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptor-object-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2448&filename=draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptor-object" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
TSVApplying Signaling Compression (SigComp) to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-sip-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-sip-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2451&filename=draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-sip" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
RAIRejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2465&filename=draft-ietf-sip-acr-code" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: The document shepherd is Dean Willis. Note IETF LC ends the day of the call.  Cullen will hold discuss on waiting for LC comments.
Token: Cullen Jennings
2.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
INTDHCP Server Identifier Override Suboption (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1911&filename=draft-ietf-dhc-server-override" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Bringing this document back to agenda, hopefully with the past issue solved
Token: Jari Arkko

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSMar 8Email Submission Operations: Access and Accountability Requirements (BCP) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hutzler-spamops-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-hutzler-spamops-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1714&filename=draft-hutzler-spamops" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Dave Crocker is the PROTO shepherd.
Token: Dan Romascanu
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSBenchmarking Methodology for IGP Data Plane Route Convergence (Informational) - 1 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-13.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-13.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2186&filename=draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
OPSTerminology for Benchmarking IGP Data Plane Route Convergence (Informational) - 2 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-13.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-13.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2187&filename=draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
OPSConsiderations for Benchmarking IGP Data Plane Route Convergence (Informational) - 3 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-13.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-13.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2188&filename=draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item Note: Dave Crocker is the PROTO shepherd.
      AreaDate
SECTwo-Document ballot: https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2172&filename=draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 4
DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) (Informational) - 1 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-03.txt
DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry (Informational)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
Token: Dan Romascanu
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSBenchmarking Methodology for IGP Data Plane Route Convergence (Informational) - 1 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-13.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-13.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2186&filename=draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
OPSTerminology for Benchmarking IGP Data Plane Route Convergence (Informational) - 2 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-13.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-13.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2187&filename=draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
OPSConsiderations for Benchmarking IGP Data Plane Route Convergence (Informational) - 3 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-13.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-13.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2188&filename=draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
SECTwo-Document ballot: https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2172&filename=draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 4
DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) (Informational) - 1 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-03.txt
DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry (Informational)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
Token: Russ Housley
OPS6to4 Reverse DNS Delegation Specification (Informational) - 2 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huston-6to4-reverse-dns-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-huston-6to4-reverse-dns-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2467&filename=draft-huston-6to4-reverse-dns" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document shepherd: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> Individual submission sponsored by AD
Token: Ron Bonica
RAIReclassification of RFC 3525 to Historic (Historic) - 3 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525-01.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525-01.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2518&filename=draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Cullen Jennings
GENIAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Revision of the Nominating and Recall Committees Timeline (Informational) - 4 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dawkins-nomcom-start-earlier-01.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-dawkins-nomcom-start-earlier-01.txt
Token: Russ Housley
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X&gt, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X&gt and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X&gt and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENCisco Systems UniDirectional Link Detection (UDLD) Protocol (Informational) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-foschiano-udld-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-foschiano-udld-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2558&filename=draft-foschiano-udld" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE

4. Working Group Actions

         

4.1 WG Creation

         
Token: Russ Housley
OPS6to4 Reverse DNS Delegation Specification (Informational) - 2 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huston-6to4-reverse-dns-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-huston-6to4-reverse-dns-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2467&filename=draft-huston-6to4-reverse-dns" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document shepherd: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> Individual submission sponsored by AD
Token: Ron Bonica
RAIReclassification of RFC 3525 to Historic (Historic) - 3 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525-01.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525-01.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2518&filename=draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Cullen Jennings
GENIAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Revision of the Nominating and Recall Committees Timeline (Informational) - 4 of 4
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dawkins-nomcom-start-earlier-01.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-dawkins-nomcom-start-earlier-01.txt
Token: Russ Housley
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X&gt, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X&gt and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X&gt and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENCisco Systems UniDirectional Link Detection (UDLD) Protocol (Informational) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-foschiano-udld-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-foschiano-udld-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2558&filename=draft-foschiano-udld" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE

4. Working Group Actions

         

4.1 WG Creation

          4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
                    NONE
         

4.2 WG Rechartering

          4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
                    NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 Requesting approval of update to ion-procdocs (Jari Arkko)

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
IESG-AGENDA-DIST@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist