[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for July 5, 2007

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Thu, 28 June 2007 22:41 UTC

Return-path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I42fu-0005mp-V5; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:41:19 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I42fu-0005mf-CI for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:41:18 -0400
Received: from ns0.neustar.com ([156.154.16.158]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I42fH-0006VB-3q for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:41:18 -0400
Received: from stiedprstage1.ietf.org (stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com [10.31.47.10]) by ns0.neustar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7440F32981 for <iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:13:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ietf by stiedprstage1.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I42Ek-0000C4-CS for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:13:14 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Cc:
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E1I42Ek-0000C4-CS@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:13:14 -0400
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 93b4f10b2112e1468b61e19ea6180478
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for July 5, 2007
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1460768496=="
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org

IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-07-05).

Updated 18:2:27 EDT, June 28, 2007

1. Administrivia

    1.1 Roll Call
    1.2 Bash the Agenda
    1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
    1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSBidirectional Flow Export using IPFIX (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipfix-biflow-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-ipfix-biflow-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2472&filename=draft-ietf-ipfix-biflow" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Nevil Brownlee is the proto-shepherd
Token: Dan Romascanu
OPSRADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-rfc4590bis-01.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-radext-rfc4590bis-01.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2485&filename=draft-ietf-radext-rfc4590bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: A revised version of non-normative Section 6 (Examples) will be provided in order to fix problems detected during the Last Call.
Token: Dan Romascanu
OPSCommon Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Implementation Issues and Suggested Fixes (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-fixes-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-radext-fixes-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2486&filename=draft-ietf-radext-fixes" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
2.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
INTDHCP Server Identifier Override Suboption (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1911&filename=draft-ietf-dhc-server-override" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Bringing this document back to agenda, hopefully with the past issue solved
Token: Jari Arkko
TSVDefinitions of Managed Objects for Middlebox Communication (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-midcom-mib-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-midcom-mib-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1981&filename=draft-ietf-midcom-mib" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Needs positions from the new people.
SEC-DIR Reviewer: Radia Perlman (Radia.Perlman@sun.com)
WG Shephard Melinda Shore
Token: Magnus Westerlund

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
SECOn the Use of Channel Bindings to Secure Channels (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-williams-on-channel-binding-02.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-williams-on-channel-binding-02.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2292&filename=draft-williams-on-channel-binding" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Sam Hartman
GENAn Interface and Algorithms for Authenticated Encryption (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mcgrew-auth-enc-02.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-mcgrew-auth-enc-02.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2534&filename=draft-mcgrew-auth-enc" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
SECIdentity-Based Cryptography Standard (IBCS) #1: Supersingular Curve Implementations of the BF and BB1 Cryptosystems (Informational) - 1 of 2
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-martin-ibcs-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-martin-ibcs-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2325&filename=draft-martin-ibcs" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
APPReclassification of the APEX RFCs to Historic (Informational) - 2 of 2
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mrose-apex-historic-02.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-mrose-apex-historic-02.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2525&filename=draft-mrose-apex-historic" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Chris Newman
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X&gt, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X&gt and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X&gt and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE

4. Working Group Actions

         

4.1 WG Creation

          4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
         
AreaDate
INTJun 18Mobility EXTensions for IPv6 (mext) - 1 of 1
Token:Jari
         

4.2 WG Rechartering

          4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
         
AreaDate
SECJun 27Kerberos (krb-wg) - 1 of 1
Token:Sam
          4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
                    NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 ion-discuss-criteria (Jon Peterson)
6.2 Allocating system (well-known) port numbers (Dan Romascanu)
6.3 Question regarding telenet numbers [IANA #87537] (Michelle Cotton)
6.4 Approval of ion-tsv-alt-cc.txt - DRAFT ION: Experimental Specification of New Congestion Control Algorithms (Lars Eggert)

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
IESG-AGENDA-DIST@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist