[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for October 18, 2007
IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Fri, 12 October 2007 04:56 UTC
Return-path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgCZz-0005b0-4h; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:56:55 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgCZy-0005aT-98 for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:56:54 -0400
Received: from ns1.neustar.com ([2001:503:c779:1a::9c9a:108a]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgCZx-0003lf-3f for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:56:54 -0400
Received: from stiedprstage1.ietf.org (stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com [10.31.47.10]) by ns1.neustar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FDA26E63 for <iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:56:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ietf by stiedprstage1.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IgCZw-0005Vn-Th for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:56:52 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Cc:
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E1IgCZw-0005Vn-Th@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:56:52 -0400
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 20f22c03b5c66958bff5ef54fcda6e48
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for October 18, 2007
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org
INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the October 18, 2007 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 0:56:52 EDT, October 12, 2007 Web version of this agenda can be found at: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/agenda.html 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes 1.4 Review of Action Items 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-signaling-15.txt Signaling MIB for PacketCable and IPCablecom Multimedia Terminal Adapters (MTAs) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 5 Note: Jean Francois Mule is the PROTO SHEPHERD of the document Token: Dan Romascanu o draft-ietf-avt-profile-savpf-11.txt Extended Secure RTP Profile for RTCP-based Feedback (RTP/SAVPF) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 5 Note: PROTO shepherd is Colin Token: Cullen Jennings o draft-ietf-crisp-iris-dchk-07.txt A Domain Availability Check (dchk) Registry Type for the Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5 Note: April Marine is Document Shepherd. Token: Chris Newman o draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client-06.txt IMAP4 Extensions for Quick Mailbox Resynchronization (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5 Token: Chris Newman o draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplite-mib-02.txt MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5 Note: Shepherd by responsible AD: Magnus Westerlund Token: Magnus Westerlund 2.1.2 Returning Item o draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman Token: Jari Arkko o draft-ietf-sip-answermode-06.txt Requesting Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 Note: Keith is shepherd. Token: Cullen Jennings 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item o draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-08.txt Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs (BCP) - 1 of 1 Token: Russ Housley 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-ippm-bw-capacity-05.txt Defining Network Capacity (Informational) - 1 of 3 Note: Document Shepherd: Matt Zekauskas (matt@internet2.edu). Token: Lars Eggert o draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-rdma-problem-statement-07.txt NFS RDMA Problem Statement (Informational) - 2 of 3 Note: Document Shepherd: Spencer Shepler (spencer.shepler@sun.com) Token: Lars Eggert o draft-ietf-radext-rfc3576bis-10.txt Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) (Informational) - 3 of 3 Token: Dan Romascanu 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item o draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (Experimental) - 1 of 1 Note: No document shepherd.. Need to bring this back to the telechat Token: Jari Arkko 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval o HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) - 1 of 1 Token: Lisa 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review o Common Control and Measurement Plane (ccamp) - 1 of 2 Token: Ross o Audio/Video Transport (avt) - 2 of 2 Token: Cullen 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval o Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) - 1 of 2 Token: Jari o Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) - 2 of 2 Token: Lars 5. IAB News We can use 6. Management Issue 6.1 ion-2026-practice.html (Russ Housley) 6.2 On Appeals of IESG and Area Director Actions and Decisions (Russ Housley) 7. Agenda Working Group News _______________________________________________ IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list IESG-AGENDA-DIST@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist
- [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Te… IESG Secretary