[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for October 4, 2007
IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Fri, 28 September 2007 03:56 UTC
Return-path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ib6yA-0005vW-49; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:56:50 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ib6y8-0005ta-LL for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:56:48 -0400
Received: from ns3.neustar.com ([156.154.24.138]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ib6y8-0008Dx-27 for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:56:48 -0400
Received: from stiedprstage1.ietf.org (stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com [10.31.47.10]) by ns3.neustar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A545E175C8 for <iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:56:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ietf by stiedprstage1.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ib6xd-000230-6g for iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:56:17 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Cc:
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E1Ib6xd-000230-6g@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:56:17 -0400
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 225414c974e0d6437992164e91287a51
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Text) for October 4, 2007
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org
INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the October 4, 2007 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 23:56:17 EDT, September 27, 2007 Web version of this agenda can be found at: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/agenda.html 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes 1.4 Review of Action Items 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-mboned-routingarch-10.txt Overview of the Internet Multicast Routing Architecture (BCP) - 1 of 4 Token: Ron Bonica o draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-isis-08.txt IS-IS Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4 Token: Ross Callon o draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks (BCP) - 3 of 4 Token: Ron Bonica o draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4 Note: Document Shepherd is Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com> Token: Jari Arkko 2.1.2 Returning Item o draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt Specification of the IPFIX Protocol for the Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 Note: A previous version draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-24.txt of this draft was. already approved by the IESG. The IPFIX WG decided to make changes to that. version of the document with the principal goal of removing the SCTP. stream 0 restriction. Reviews should focus on the changes since. draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-24.txt which are mentioned in an editorial note. currently placed after the Table of Contents.. Token: Dan Romascanu o draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman Token: Jari Arkko 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item o draft-wilde-text-fragment-08.txt URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/plain Media Type (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 Token: Chris Newman 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item NONE 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item o draft-edwards-urn-smpte-02.txt A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) (Informational) - 1 of 3 Token: Chris Newman o draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15.txt EAP-IKEv2 Method (Experimental) - 2 of 3 Note: There is no Document Shepherd.. Note: LC expires Oct 9, I will take this to the IESG 5 days before that Token: Jari Arkko o draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (Experimental) - 3 of 3 Note: No document shepherd.. Note: LC Expires Oct 8, will take this to IESG four days before that Token: Jari Arkko 3.2.2 Returning Item o draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry (Informational) - 1 of 1 Token: Russ Housley 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review o HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis) - 1 of 1 Token: Lisa 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review o Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) - 1 of 2 Token: Jari o Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) - 2 of 2 Token: Lars 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We can use 6. Management Issue 6.1 IESG Statement about Appeals (Russ Housley) 6.2 Expert for RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-15.txt [IANA #106002] (Michelle Cotton) 6.3 ion-2026-practice.html (Russ Housley) 7. Agenda Working Group News _______________________________________________ IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list IESG-AGENDA-DIST@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist
- [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (Plain Te… IESG Secretary