[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for December 18, 2008

[IESG Secretary <[e-mail]>]

IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-12-18).

---

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions           2.1.1 New Item       Area Date TSV TCP User Timeout Option (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-uto-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-uto-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2028&filename=draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-uto" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Magnus Westerlund RTG ForCES Protocol Specification (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-protocol-19.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-forces-protocol-19.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2069&filename=draft-ietf-forces-protocol" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG ForCES MIB (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-mib-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-forces-mib-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2274&filename=draft-ietf-forces-mib" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon APP Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2819&filename=draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault INT Mobile IPv6 Support for Dual Stack Hosts and Routers (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2864&filename=draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko TSV IANA Considerations for RPC Net Identifiers and Universal Address Formats (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-netid-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-netid-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2869&filename=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-netid" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd: Spencer Shepler ([e-mail]) Token: Lars Eggert RTG OSPF Link-local Signaling (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-ospf-lls-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2901&filename=draft-ietf-ospf-lls" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward SEC Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message Specification (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-3851bis-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-smime-3851bis-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2905&filename=draft-ietf-smime-3851bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk SEC Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Certificate Handling (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-3850bis-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-smime-3850bis-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2906&filename=draft-ietf-smime-3850bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk SEC Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-10.txt Note: Document shepherd is [e-mail] Token: Pasi Eronen APP Sieve Email Filtering: Ihave Extension (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-freed-sieve-ihave-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-freed-sieve-ihave-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2970&filename=draft-freed-sieve-ihave" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault RTG Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) label stack entry: "EXP" field renamed to "Traffic Class" field (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 12 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2976&filename=draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon 2.1.2 Returning Item       NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions           2.2.1 New Item       Area Date APP Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-18.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-18.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2899&filename=draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 2.2.2 Returning Item       NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"           3.1.1 New Item       Area Date RTG LDP IGP Synchronization (Informational) - 1 of 3 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-igp-sync-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-igp-sync-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2853&filename=draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-igp-sync" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward RTG OSPFv3 Based Layer 1 VPN Auto-Discovery (Experimental) - 2 of 3 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospfv3-auto-discovery-02.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospfv3-auto-discovery-02.txt Token: David Ward RTG Urban WSNs Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks (Informational) - 3 of 3 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs-02.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs-02.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2958&filename=draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward 3.1.2 Returning Item       NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"           3.2.1 New Item       NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item       NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.           3.3.1 New Item       NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item       NONE

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation           4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review                     NONE           4.1.2 Proposed for Approval                     NONE

4.2 WG Rechartering           4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review                     NONE           4.2.2 Proposed for Approval                     NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist