[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for December 11, 2008

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Thu, 04 December 2008 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-iesg-agenda-dist-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC233A685C; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:59:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iesg-agenda-dist@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 951E03A685C; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:59:27 -0800 (PST)
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20081204225927.951E03A685C@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:59:27 -0800
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for December 11, 2008
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2116909480=="
Sender: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org

IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-12-11).


1. Administrivia

    1.1 Roll Call
    1.2 Bash the Agenda
    1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
    1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
TSVBasic Forward Error Correction (FEC) Schemes (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-06.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2008&filename=draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
TSVRPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 (Draft Standard) - 2 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2392&filename=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd: Spencer Shepler (spencer.shepler@gmail.com)
Token: Lars Eggert
RAIAssociating Time-codes with RTP streams (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-smpte-rtp-14.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-avt-smpte-rtp-14.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2496&filename=draft-ietf-avt-smpte-rtp" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Tom Taylor is the PROTO Shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
APPIMAP4 extension for named searches (filters) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-melnikov-imapext-filters-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-melnikov-imapext-filters-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2718&filename=draft-melnikov-imapext-filters" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Dave Cridland is document shepherd.
Token: Chris Newman
RTGIS-IS Generic Cryptographic Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2722&filename=draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
SECUsing SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message Syntax (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-sha2-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-smime-sha2-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2737&filename=draft-ietf-smime-sha2" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
RTGPreserving Topology Confidentiality in Inter-Domain Path Computation Using a Key-Based Mechanism (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-path-key-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-pce-path-key-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2817&filename=draft-ietf-pce-path-key" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
INTMobile IPv6 Support for Dual Stack Hosts and Routers (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt
Token: Jari Arkko
TSVForward RTO-Recovery (F-RTO): An Algorithm for Detecting Spurious Retransmission Timeouts with TCP (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc4138bis-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc4138bis-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2889&filename=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc4138bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Wesley Eddy (wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov) (TCPM co-chair) is the shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
INTDHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery-05.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery-05.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2921&filename=draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jari Arkko
RAIRTP Payload format for G.719 (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g719-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g719-04.txt
Token: Cullen Jennings
2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPIMAP METADATA Extension (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-16.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-16.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2470&filename=draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Alexey Melnikov is document shepherd.
Token: Chris Newman
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPLEMONADE Architecture - Supporting Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) Mobile Email (MEM) using Internet Mail (Informational) - 1 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-lemonade-architecture-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-lemonade-architecture-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2856&filename=draft-ietf-lemonade-architecture" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Alexey Melnikov is document shepherd.
Token: Chris Newman
RTGAn Analysis of Scaling Issues in MPLS-TE Core Networks (Informational) - 2 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis-04.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis-04.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2867&filename=draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
RTGThe RPF Vector TLV (Informational) - 3 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-rpf-vector-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-pim-rpf-vector-06.txt
Token: David Ward
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENMIKEY General Extension Payload for OMA BCAST 1.0 (Informational) - 1 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jerichow-msec-mikey-genext-oma-00.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-jerichow-msec-mikey-genext-oma-00.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2943&filename=draft-jerichow-msec-mikey-genext-oma" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
SECDigital Signatures on Internet-Draft Documents (Informational) - 2 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-housley-internet-draft-sig-file-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-housley-internet-draft-sig-file-06.txt
Token: Tim Polk
SECAES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure Shell Transport Layer Protocol (Informational) - 3 of 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-igoe-secsh-aes-gcm-00.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-igoe-secsh-aes-gcm-00.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2952&filename=draft-igoe-secsh-aes-gcm" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPDNS Blacklists and Whitelists (Informational) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt
Note: Propose to respond "1. The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work."
Token: Lisa Dusseault
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE

4. Working Group Actions

         

4.1 WG Creation

          4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
                    NONE
         

4.2 WG Rechartering

          4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
                    NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 Executive session: Appeal of DNSOP WG Decision of September 13, 2008 (Lisa Dusseault)

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
IESG-AGENDA-DIST@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist