[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for December 4, 2008

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org> Mon, 01 December 2008 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-iesg-agenda-dist-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AC63A6A8F; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 06:17:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Delivered-To: iesg-agenda-dist@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id CC7673A6A88; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 06:17:08 -0800 (PST)
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary-reply@ietf.org>
To: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20081201141708.CC7673A6A88@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:17:08 -0800
Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for December 4, 2008
X-BeenThere: iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distribution of IESG agendas <iesg-agenda-dist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/iesg-agenda-dist>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist>, <mailto:iesg-agenda-dist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1823618577=="
Sender: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: iesg-agenda-dist-bounces@ietf.org

IESG Agenda

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-12-04).


1. Administrivia

    1.1 Roll Call
    1.2 Bash the Agenda
    1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
    1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
TSVNFS Version 4 Minor Version 1 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-26.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-26.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2135&filename=draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Brian Pawslowski (beepy@netapp.com) is the document shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
TSVpNFS Block/Volume Layout (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-block-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-block-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2136&filename=draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-block" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lars Eggert
TSVObject-based pNFS Operations (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-obj-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-obj-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2137&filename=draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-obj" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lars Eggert
APPSieve Notification Mechanism: mailto (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2644&filename=draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Barry Leiba to be the expert reviewer for the registry this creates.
Token: Lisa Dusseault
INTDual Stack Mobile IPv4 (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip4-dsmipv4-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-mip4-dsmipv4-08.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2733&filename=draft-ietf-mip4-dsmipv4" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jari Arkko
APPExtended URLFETCH for binary and converted parts (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cridland-urlfetch-binary-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-cridland-urlfetch-binary-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2816&filename=draft-cridland-urlfetch-binary" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Eric Burger is document shepherd.  Note this is a lemonade WG document despite the name.
Token: Chris Newman
APPThe IMAP NOTIFY Extension (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify-07.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2852&filename=draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Eric Burger is document shepherd
Token: Chris Newman
INTMeasures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2871&filename=draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
INTMultiple Care-of Addresses Registration (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2878&filename=draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jari Arkko
TSVNFSv4 Minor Version 1 XDR Description (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-dot-x-09.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-dot-x-09.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2892&filename=draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-dot-x" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Brian Pawslowski (beepy@netapp.com) is the document shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
INTReserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 11
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids-01.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids-01.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2954&filename=draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jari Arkko
2.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
TSVGIST: General Internet Signalling Transport (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-17.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-17.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1546&filename=draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: RE-evaluate your ABSTAIN positions. All that stays in ABSTAIN please indicate in the comment field that you have performed this re-evaluation and also include some motivation behind your decision.
Token: Magnus Westerlund

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENIESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions (BCP) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-06.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-06.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2895&filename=draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Diff: http://www.arkko.com/ietf/iesg/rfc3932bisdiff.html
Token: Jari Arkko
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
INTRequirements for Replacing AppleTalk (Informational) - 1 of 2
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-07.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-07.txt
Token: Mark Townsley
GENIANA Allocation Guidelines for the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) (Informational) - 2 of 2
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-arkko-arp-iana-rules-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-arkko-arp-iana-rules-03.txt https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=2949&filename=draft-arkko-arp-iana-rules" rel="nofollow">[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPDNS Blacklists and Whitelists (Informational) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt
Note: Propose to respond "1. The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work."
Token: Lisa Dusseault
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE
3.3.3 For Action
      AreaDate
INTPPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE) Extensions for Credit Flow and Link Metrics (Informational) - 1 of 1
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt
Token: Mark Townsley

4. Working Group Actions

         

4.1 WG Creation

          4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
                    NONE
         

4.2 WG Rechartering

          4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
                    NONE
          4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
                    NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 CEA Media Type Application "cea-2018+xml" (Russ Housley)
6.2 IANA expert for TLS registries (Pasi Eronen)
6.3 Request to the RFC Editor to expedite processing of the CAPWAP Protocol Specification (Dan Romascanu)
6.4 Approval of application/emma+xml media type (Chris Newman)
6.5 Telechat schedule for January (Tim Polk)

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
IESG-AGENDA-DIST@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist