Re: Where is Content-language defined these days?

ned+ietf-822@mrochek.com Thu, 28 June 2001 16:22 UTC

Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:22:00 -0700
From: ned+ietf-822@mrochek.com
Subject: Re: Where is Content-language defined these days?
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:12:42 +0100" <5.0.2.1.2.20010628140705.00a05750@joy.songbird.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org, ietf-822@imc.org
Message-id: <01K5AN22RUH80000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-822@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk

> As far as I can tell, the most recent document defining the
> Content-language header is RFC1766.  But, according to the RFC index:

> 1766 Tags for the Identification of Languages. H. Alvestrand. March
>       1995. (Format: TXT=16966 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC3066) (Status:
>       PROPOSED STANDARD)

> But RFC3066 says nothing about Content-language, other than it being moved
> to another document.  I have failed to discover what other document.

draft-alvestrand-content-language-02.txt.

				Ned

Re: Where is Content-language defined these days? Martin Duerst
Re: Where is Content-language defined these days? ned+ietf-822
Where is Content-language defined these days? Graham Klyne