Re: Where is Content-language defined these days?

Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> Fri, 29 June 2001 11:14 UTC

Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20010629105719.05f43c90@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:59:44 +0900
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, discuss@apps.ietf.org, ietf-822@imc.org
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Where is Content-language defined these days?
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010628140705.00a05750@joy.songbird.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ietf-822@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk

Graham - Harald is working on that document. Draft at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-alvestrand-content-language-02.txt


Regards,   Martin.

At 14:12 01/06/28 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>As far as I can tell, the most recent document defining the 
>Content-language header is RFC1766.  But, according to the RFC index:
>
>1766 Tags for the Identification of Languages. H. Alvestrand. March
>      1995. (Format: TXT=16966 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC3066) (Status:
>      PROPOSED STANDARD)
>
>But RFC3066 says nothing about Content-language, other than it being moved 
>to another document.  I have failed to discover what other document.
>
>#g
>
>
>------------
>Graham Klyne
>(GK@ACM.ORG)
>

Re: Where is Content-language defined these days? Martin Duerst
Re: Where is Content-language defined these days? ned+ietf-822
Where is Content-language defined these days? Graham Klyne