Re: Informational RFC-to-be - draft-rfced-info-touch-00.txt
Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Thu, 21 March 1996 20:52 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29469; 21 Mar 96 15:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29465; 21 Mar 96 15:52 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13698; 21 Mar 96 15:52 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29444; 21 Mar 96 15:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29440; 21 Mar 96 15:52 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13691; 21 Mar 96 15:52 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29421; 21 Mar 96 15:52 EST
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Informational RFC-to-be - draft-rfced-info-touch-00.txt
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 21 Mar 96 12:51:55 PST." <199603212051.AA13932@akamai.isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 15:52:12 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9603211552.aa29421@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Is anyone other than me overly concerned over the large number of rfced documents being submitted? Not that they are being submitted per se, but the ratio of non-standards track documents to standards track documents is getting larger and larger. The reading list is almost the size of our local library!
- Informational RFC-to-be - draft-rfced-info-touch-… rfc-ed
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - draft-rfced-info-to… Steve Coya
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - draft-rfced-info-to… Frank Kastenholz
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - draft-rfced-info-to… jkrey
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - draft-rfced-info-to… Steve Coya
- Re: Informational RFC-to-be - draft-rfced-info-to… Fred Baker