[Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7970F12951E for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hG5sog1SoaJQ for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE80129532 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id m27so45047856iti.1 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XByCO7vF+yqfQlr40GvElUVSlKpNrbN802Ycj7UFfgA=; b=Dvt6eK3HfA+bWFempEorITbDtU32+cDG6ncHoIqCFggKosBW7717lCdOZJK3IAtYOG fNRUVqiPoeKKV1u0LmSW5eyj1ASJr8d//s6bVJ/1R008W4a7DGcd+4ZK/ZtYV27JrvDy jLR7cTzV73gpwHtnhoTfYt872qZPDbpyL01VvwY7B3QMXFLq0bRsrF+nmghaypaFXupk UvY0wu9yyWZ7BfYbwzDWMIx7fU96m0mXtlS4XbZX3r4/jvnxM5xWwa0Jh4iuQ6W6NpDK /HqxJl/8zp+rq8NgmsdzD2HfbfPuGftgtSTO6j6k3bfvvSpky7kirlygDBgyGs8QqAwT eB9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XByCO7vF+yqfQlr40GvElUVSlKpNrbN802Ycj7UFfgA=; b=jBWLb0bFiet1o8kGSx6niOqxrYhHuepVj46y3m6Jm5t/gw1Oc5P+tKIwjhqZ5CHFd0 DYy9wi186ytrarL8m26D2pOGaB1P3mcDF4U8DhBwyPb15AarOtOx3sZLjMG6WwvMlkfH CZm0fJ9Pyz8+lwnYHWMNB/duOHsKOdsPlCBGqSUAJd8ieQY4aApNOUl9qxB/q4Pej3VO kdtXUt0B0nJeeqsIzExC26jXBz7aUHqEBzFLFdx0kVP2rxhpNb8///e0lBUgpIY/WZVn 7GcLidesILyFJrRApWsf1NJwvmfliCeCcgM/pzC0wzB0Yz8JE7LdrOkpiXdLVmdciH3f fnrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2T6eN5Pr0GWcHro96O00+pywUrzi/sMb2lmvRggDlQySOj4aPouxOGLbcbzPgAgw==
X-Received: by 10.36.34.212 with SMTP id o203mr12073759ito.103.1489673999791; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.11.95] (50-76-68-137-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.68.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm3002598ioe.48.2017.03.16.07.19.58 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
References: <B1A0A921-3034-45B7-BE70-6490BA95A6D7@vpnc.org> <CABkgnnX6Qqhe6D63npbwxUVXa5sOY9AdZ9Ew5Jnb39rY-npjdg@mail.gmail.com> <F3CC8F03-1B28-4944-AFA4-A742B02FC8A0@mnot.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <b1c4f37b-c6b5-ac29-5d2e-28c57a988a0d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 03:20:08 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F3CC8F03-1B28-4944-AFA4-A742B02FC8A0@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/3OOiZeX4oN9sP9zvLEnXqMLQTXE>
Subject: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:20:14 -0000

So could somebody with experience set out the pros and cons of
(a single repo per WG) vs (an 'organization' with a repo per draft)?

Regards
   Brian

On 16/03/2017 18:49, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
>> On 16 Mar 2017, at 4:25 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> HTTPBIS - all working group drafts are in a single repo (this is not
>> working out great
> 
> yes, we know you have an axe to grind...
> 
>> ) and all issues are tracked there; discussion is on
>> github; materials like agendas and meeting arrangements are on github
>> too
> 
> Also WG home page -- <https://httpwg.github.io/>.
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-and-github mailing list
> Ietf-and-github@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github
> .
>