Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 19 March 2017 13:24 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD306129498 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 06:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id orPHxVhkQV6U for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 06:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D184B127097 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2JDNw2I004463; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:23:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DCCCDC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.205.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vmKXs6yLdzDHfs; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:23:57 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <94FD4A8C-7178-425E-AB9B-3CB89C16B2FD@netapp.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:23:57 +0100
Cc: "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 511622637.400571-53bc4b51d0eb84e4abdfdeba7061b84a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <09E8FEB9-3B77-430A-9C2C-5197D83DA123@tzi.org>
References: <B1A0A921-3034-45B7-BE70-6490BA95A6D7@vpnc.org> <CABkgnnX6Qqhe6D63npbwxUVXa5sOY9AdZ9Ew5Jnb39rY-npjdg@mail.gmail.com> <F3CC8F03-1B28-4944-AFA4-A742B02FC8A0@mnot.net> <b1c4f37b-c6b5-ac29-5d2e-28c57a988a0d@gmail.com> <182C3216-14F6-4D29-AF6B-54FAF71666E8@mnot.net> <46A5629D-57F0-4F39-BE8C-5E94CA67C404@tzi.org> <CAOdDvNo8PfkK3Vr=MMbeaiT0Xmiz0xVRen0Xa08P25fGxSotUQ@mail.gmail.com> <C3C377A6-82D4-4800-81EE-903469407E8C@tzi.org> <94FD4A8C-7178-425E-AB9B-3CB89C16B2FD@netapp.com>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/qSVb5PdKCI03MQ3Gl4ZfkSxCdIw>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:24:07 -0000
> On 19 Mar 2017, at 13:29, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote: > > On 2017-3-17, at 16:09, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >> It would also be nice if the chairs could annotate drafts with their github existence. > > This sounds like a nice codesprint project. Can we codesprint on tools.ietf.org? So far, code sprints have focused on datatracker, I believe. Grüße, Carsten
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Eggert, Lars
- [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using GitHub Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Carsten Bormann
- [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Patrick McManus
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Martin Thomson