IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-and-github] New draft, and proposal for BoF at IETF 103

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 20 September 2018 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC7B130E12 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=mxsM0dzg; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=i3pjpiZv
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0IqnrbsZ8zOD for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E97130DEE for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BB021F8F; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:12:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:12:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Nmoh8UNqqR99DiutMCNAdJXyzjADI xWDCLOFLWKHx2k=; b=mxsM0dzgPRuuvajNtJFHIDLDJW2xMSkxecqDuISqDCjH3 /8pnJhdWgGiR2+ra8OlpCMgmIyzf1QuEwkAAt7x+rqIZQzsbGvX4/jV9quWwgHbn RZvirkKFrlWo+XAUhPQ9+nc2zoL4cvVJXQ1rM7xMebkA6JnscEykDu2iygSEq4K8 GtmKM2rlts+SF8hyXw4Cz8LUOTlRvVfBCuKqoM7rKLL/EYDSmj29X1f4H7mcUxty vkQTWSONHSXMNbgRRvTKEIFIJhlaagOG31fH1pBMK7+IkY3QleXZf3IhEE8kLmTP gxK2us1bs0gIavg0qhBUkzsk/Fw4rXMdBDNe1uy0g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Nmoh8U NqqR99DiutMCNAdJXyzjADIxWDCLOFLWKHx2k=; b=i3pjpiZv1WYEDZCIJq+uc4 C9aHE164Qj3J0ziwd6/mPWU23UOfsQQBA7hZvMozLOjNTjsS5Dg8iiZqbbqW8kn1 mifuKs06iDc6DS6P57BIYDUYXQPkWI/sla/hH4mlgi9l7Uny38U9luqyY81tKrN4 pOy6whXwQHffGsnK3DVkL3ysV0plLgHbqis8IlMR4VNBUCo2zuulYrJGLZ5OZp/g /77d7L0MDhChFmZU4T2XedN6dS/gelh1BKY75/77iB7QcYmOVaAGfPgKmZfJ7Bmr Sf0M4M8sZi/jWa1al8eq9+PtkhsYmB0hMiQ+OaAZaiYEEkoN+fAcXVEe310qdK/Q ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:_uKjWzcMkASZtEkAa2mrs82oxqMqo8SLJUvJ3aOOR5G0JLDG44RrwA> <xmx:_uKjWzyr7L6Fj0cvfpUwDL2Vw-5_wD17EfK_xaan_70o6qXRg3iiyA> <xmx:_uKjW5HeDKnK9z8MQLrbM3TegoHvZWewgR8q1xKvuiiDZ1e_egRSfg> <xmx:_uKjW3w_XiPkWEQJLB3bsNFcyr2gNWqBG1_u9SkAG6moi7v6_p7iZw> <xmx:_uKjW6u9EBkiR6qvTYFbp0e-b1begsHjoZjQnytcTY6dE6hGhzWZ2A> <xmx:_-KjWxjA314IxulvvW-iyDXF4WSvG7DIjUNbSUiTjJmB5LiIX-kBcA>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_uKjW6leFLKVr_vSlyt7toAoWB9In4ecw31vjsV700axYcH30EkaZQ>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.77]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 51836E462B; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:12:14 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <1B6523C5-5A56-4592-9545-F847C4C5F509@eggert.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:12:12 -0400
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A10B00CC-161A-49FD-B549-359B14DA3DF9@cooperw.in>
References: <5FED3790-8276-431F-85F1-6E42C57BA2F0@icann.org> <15767A94-7E61-4A91-8DB3-719BB55C0ABC@cooperw.in> <1B6523C5-5A56-4592-9545-F847C4C5F509@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/3WxCF-GcEmE3T8q24z1xdDKLHJY>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] New draft, and proposal for BoF at IETF 103
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:12:19 -0000


> On Sep 19, 2018, at 9:00 AM, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2018-9-19, at 8:43, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
>>> On Sep 14, 2018, at 8:08 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
>>> Greetings again. Alissa and I have started a new draft:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cooper-wugh-github-wg-configuration/
>> 
>> There have been no comments on this. Does that mean the proposals in the doc are uncontroversial, and we should skip the BOF and just proceed to working with the tools team and secretariat? Or does it mean people are busy, or not paying attention? It would be helpful to get a few answers to those questions to help figure out whether we need BOF time for this or not.
> 
> no offense, but there isn't really anything non-obvious in draft-cooper-wugh-github-wg-configuration. IMO draft-thomson-github-bcp-00 is quite a bit more practically useful. Is that also in scope for discussion?

I think it certainly could be, especially if people think the outcome would be different from the last BoF discussion of it.

Alissa

> 
> As for the BOF, I'm not personally missing much integration on the IETF side. I would like more integration on the GitHub side, but that we can't directly influence. But if others have ideas for what might be useful to do on our side, sure.
> 
> Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email