IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-and-github] New draft, and proposal for BoF at IETF 103

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 19 September 2018 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0169A130E5E for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4LAuxg0tcG6 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD511127332 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id f1-v6so3218257plt.4 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+QSLSmEv5lN/T7JQDsawJ0Vh63PJphsL88VuBLeejes=; b=SwZ3c63MqPudceJUyFynC5/eFJm+J/NWAPDevdXiZp0CuhtNq0BkgNxTLF7BhNSMlT gZOdt7KJJXequtt6Wwppv15L5dGwJ0fL6rwd59EeDpomWVrnixO3VPseJDFMVBj7C9aD Kgpo5HVysRzdkmBP9p3vZF/irD2Q0MOkrUY59TqO0Be/ts/fxrMXPHnvyLKBHl3aaLTE 2XrjSvncKaCmz0O3q6jH8v8pIYcODTl8MpMCBzjGPbgli0PdwLk86ao4ZV06dB05GuSl pncWbTMF5ZLcZrcU/icy4Ek5jDW1z4Ur8lxQ/KL/v7lLditA8PJlNJGLrUtWBPjywQmr +BQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+QSLSmEv5lN/T7JQDsawJ0Vh63PJphsL88VuBLeejes=; b=lovg32nmeI22KUfKHMj0/DSatW41WfZ7t3doSxUfa/i3TsdD51+KSjHuUFErjGSzdc /xMCOM3davo+he5Y1RJ6VMX1ZjJg0gCpAnAfIlFG2EDycvjLtt9Ry81+D2WcgGG8Fifg jzycl2RVKdKXPm9phYt2gZpgTZLG738Uc2PSrxlphRHPPDYM+4SG01vtlVKabwcoieyw HCXMA2xpaR2TsbV60IKyxgV/lQ/3lfVVMcK5BxuVnTkxJkQJasGXTCVSmfBXSaKWMYxc iuQWH9ZQ9Lbbd3b5la3DQb/rnHS7prEoSsqRLbcCKzPGM2S2NJTDiKXSLZq0ndHvWWbv +5JQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DklUKYHiLFOCdMpuS3UpHuhvPi/O7R+WfKa229jBAA+6wGtPfF kiey4uWYV77SmOL81Irxr3y9C/W7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYlqP3xrYmX8vl5DH8Vh0jqkzW+aNcqNZdziDNUl5y/5vDBmuoQVzae9faMw7oL2yexJ8tKzw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc8b:: with SMTP id bb11-v6mr35497629plb.112.1537390664936; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([118.148.76.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b64-v6sm29246163pfg.66.2018.09.19.13.57.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
References: <5FED3790-8276-431F-85F1-6E42C57BA2F0@icann.org> <15767A94-7E61-4A91-8DB3-719BB55C0ABC@cooperw.in>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <3a79f4c6-30a1-22d0-eebb-054adb183c24@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:57:38 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <15767A94-7E61-4A91-8DB3-719BB55C0ABC@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/yDbEdkPDXuznTIORL7rzz3q0oNk>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] New draft, and proposal for BoF at IETF 103
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 20:57:48 -0000

Alissa,

Since I won't be in Bangkok I don't have a strong view on whether
a BOF is needed or not. I think we need draft(s) on how to do things
and we need discussion on how the use of github fits into the open
consensus process. Personally I find the stream of consciousness
messages from a git issue tracker pretty indigestible, for example.
Actual decisions on substantive changes seem to need normal human-generated
emails.

Regards
   Brian


On 2018-09-20 00:43, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2018, at 8:08 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings again. Alissa and I have started a new draft:
>>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cooper-wugh-github-wg-configuration/
>>
>> The purpose of the draft is to design tooling in the IETF for WGs to start using GitHub if they aren't already, and to help individuals within WGs as well. It is definitely *not* to standardize GitHub interactions in WGs.
>>
>> And, to this end, we have proposed a BoF for IETF 103 in Bangkok to discuss the ideas and see if there is community interest.
>>   https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki#WGsUsingGitHub
> 
> There have been no comments on this. Does that mean the proposals in the doc are uncontroversial, and we should skip the BOF and just proceed to working with the tools team and secretariat? Or does it mean people are busy, or not paying attention? It would be helpful to get a few answers to those questions to help figure out whether we need BOF time for this or not.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> 
>>
>> Comments on either or both of these are welcome.
>>
>> --Paul Hoffman
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-and-github mailing list
>> Ietf-and-github@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-and-github mailing list
> Ietf-and-github@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email