IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 02 November 2019 04:51 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46ECF120033 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 21:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4w0lgFMRro6g for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 21:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3231120074 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 21:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id c184so8384436pfb.0 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zwE72WhgH8gRVJMFUUZ73z4xCUd0bHqYh/33JbtUPjA=; b=QN0S51tZweFE6jpYmwvY+CwiNKf9x1H118irDTvLEmySEVjcyngooWEhL7ON5blBif W+JYqvw0F2K0hxw2Gbmiz5vhkdLNy3BsrG8N7/d/l5722dcNfoZ0tigxA0a+mb7RYL7Q nPu4t0Y4G8urLOs8Qr/Zc9CPw5KNykjRItmCjdVnpMwZhoR1ALMf/Roj2Fn/Sr1I65ag u3ncDUExiKj2UTj8BvvKNnCp4lLbeTv0d2QINjIceGdBrbIkYmztRBVNc7y3jsIHhCVw qa2IwBsmL9QuMXLL20tN5lJGseEHHCj3UlIq9F8Fyf4Y+TJfDUQC3T9NYhXIWvHmeMPl ziKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zwE72WhgH8gRVJMFUUZ73z4xCUd0bHqYh/33JbtUPjA=; b=Wlz6SbrHWLrF0/bnhT3GiORKWjLWUZXpXxFGBjqXm2Kpg/F9FGuQUipyKP7nUYt8y2 MSuqonJQ1hIsAmVEeKJ8Hq6aWO4EMdgNaoRVSZoYGy9Ok0+cRQGyspVoBo3Xj2LQIbQd uBUhRmPUin9mQBuf0iFMAAPqLq/JTZGUGyws0pDMM1sJb6cn/Yx6MwybLWn95tPzrS38 GeoOOPJIKS+dwO1VhggAthbR5jSZ1ijfNF0qXMFyY7uoP1rg+Y9tCHlMaOY2rusk8TjO ZSl6PiqxKnAOArBtvNPUBsqVpiMzcJMLgsvGu4pDUHfaI1q9nUFmK+T3prlCDxNnSw3y PUSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVLZIkaS4Or8TJhIl+mxrzVHDUEviJCEJRR1GyMbN1XOiphyqiD mSx8mXjgrAaFx7p6uF7tKRy8Qpk5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx+qlzKjd7lNxwkjyTLUFqmDVQhrb1BJC+pnLAG9kABvIkaKJzVWChq7rvXM+tyvs7nY2rqgg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:e84f:: with SMTP id a15mr17804097pgk.309.1572670314065; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (46.137.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.137.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm9050573pjt.20.2019.11.01.21.51.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
References: <CAChr6SyD=SE=z=Rvsp11orymu1=DMfvYe3X-xmwdCV8_3ygdJA@mail.gmail.com> <a1be63d2-67c7-4efe-a0b6-5e18531c0cce@www.fastmail.com> <CAChr6SyZoasUYt0BUryppAwHz7JS0ncSGZP-iY-zQTGQAZLLzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw+SDCUd_FDPG-z-Lg=T3ZH3YgjBjMzB8A1W3mJsSk2zg@mail.gmail.com> <9E634E81-48C5-4EDA-B98E-972A7CACF641@akamai.com> <CAChr6Sz1pz2JpamQupBDsdTb4ArNJOfVAtZs9BypCnWbaSYEPg@mail.gmail.com> <200DEDAC-A18D-45B4-BC0F-69D8970CED47@akamai.com> <CAChr6Sx7k_WGvkWG-mk-kfV1hwYjUUKb6Rf3sCfihRtD5MO4QA@mail.gmail.com> <1c10b7bd-8580-0ff6-8e3e-0c4e2c48518e@joelhalpern.com> <3dbbafe7-43b9-191e-4cc8-ce192c016627@gmail.com> <CAChr6SzrRfLwia6cYix_8ub5H152gorXP-6ivguyT8d99_pZ-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ef7afa06-ebe1-87ca-8cf8-014071ef0ff8@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 17:51:49 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SzrRfLwia6cYix_8ub5H152gorXP-6ivguyT8d99_pZ-g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/Gco23Dzz7J0tG3jCMX3YGhOmyPY>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 04:51:58 -0000

> That is interesting. Has anything ever been overturned on appeal?

For GitHub usage, I have no idea. In general:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-6.5
https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/appeals/
Appeals can be dealt with between the appellant, the WG Chairs, and the AD,
without invoking the formal process, and those go uncounted.

Regards
   Brian

On 02-Nov-19 15:42, Rob Sayre wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:22 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 02-Nov-19 14:41, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>     > Looking at the draft, I think something that would address the issue Rob
>     > is raising is that the first paragraph of 4.1.2 (about closing issues)
>     > get an extra sentence.  Along the lines of:
>     >      As noted in section 2.2, this guidance MUST be communicated to and
>     > agreed by the working groups.
> 
>     Agreed.
> 
>     > One can argue that this is implicit in the document.  It seems like it
>     > could help clarity and can't hurt.
> 
>     It's already clear in the document that normal IETF process rules
>     apply, i.e. RFC2418 etc. That certainly implies quite a lot, including
>     of course that contested decisions are appealable.
> 
> 
> That is interesting. Has anything ever been overturned on appeal?
> 
> It would be good to record such an occurrence in future documents.
> 
> thanks,
> Rob
>   

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email